Research Article |
Corresponding author: Sarah Mângia ( sarahmangia@yahoo.com.br ) Academic editor: Günter Gollmann
© 2019 Sarah Mângia, Felipe Camurugi, Elvis Almeida Pereira, Priscila Carvalho, David Lucas Röhr, Henrique Folly, Diego José Santana.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Mângia S, Camurugi F, Pereira EA, Carvalho P, Röhr DL, Folly H, Santana DJ (2019) Release calls of four species of Phyllomedusidae (Amphibia, Anura). Herpetozoa 32: 77-81. https://doi.org/10.3897/herpetozoa.32.e35729
|
Anurans emit a variety of acoustic signals in different behavioral contexts during the breeding season. The release call is a signal produced by the frog when it is inappropriately clasped by another frog. In the family Phyllomedusidae, this call type is known only for Pithecophus ayeaye. Here we describe the release call of four species: Phyllomedusa bahiana, P. sauvagii, Pithecopus rohdei, and P. nordestinus, based on recordings in the field. The release calls of these four species consist of a multipulsed note. Smaller species of the Pithecopus genus (P. ayeaye, P. rohdei and P. nordestinus), presented shorter release calls (0.022–0.070 s), with higher dominant frequency on average (1508.8–1651.8 Hz), when compared to the bigger Phyllomedusa (P. bahiana and P. sauvagii) (0.062–0.107 s; 798.7–1071.4 Hz). For phyllomedusid species, the release call might indicate a phylogenetic signal, because species of the same genus have similar acoustic traits.
vocalization, animal behavior, bioacoustics, Phyllomedusa, Pithecopus
The complexity of anuran calling behaviour has been revealed for several Neotropical species (
The release call is a signal produced by the frog when it is inappropriately clasped by another frog (
The family Phyllomedusidae is currently composed of 65 species distributed in eight genera (
Given the importance of the release call for anuran systematic, and the few data about this call type for phyllomedusids, herein we describe the release call of four species: Phyllomedusa bahiana A.
We use acoustic data from different field works. All recorded calls were emitted in the field when the males were being handled, pressed in both sides of the body, in the axillary region, simulating an amplexus.
We summarize all data on the release calls recorded in Table
Data on the release calls recorded on the species of Phyllomedusa and Pithecopus analyzed in this study.
Species | Locality | Coordinates | Altitude (m) | Recorder | Date | Air Temperature (°C) | Individual Label/Record |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phyllomedusa bahiana | Serra de São José, Feira de Santana, Bahia | 12°5’45.04”S, 39°2’47.49”W | 350 | Marantz PMD660 | 8 Feb 2012 | NA | MZFS3934/ MAP-V0205 |
Phyllomedusa bahiana | Serra de São José, Feira de Santana, Bahia | 12°5’45.04”S, 39°2’47.49”W | 350 | Marantz PMD660 | 8 Feb 2012 | NA | MZFS3935/ MAP-V0206 |
Phyllomedusa sauvagii | Estância Mimosa, Bonito, Mato Grosso do Sul | 20°58’49”S, 56°30’32”W | 450 | Tascam DR-40 | 8 Jan 2017 | 27.0 | ZUFMS-AMP10561/ MAP-V0209 |
Pithecopus rohdei | Barão de Monte Alto, Minas Gerais | 21°16’29.30”S, 42°14’5.40”W | 450 | Olympus DM-420 | 21 Aug 2013 | 30.9 | MZUFV 13898/ MAP-V0208 |
Pithecopus nordestinus | São Bento do Norte, Rio Grande do Norte | 5°6’34”S, 35°55’50”W | 10 | Panasonic RR-US450 | 29 Mar 2012 | NA | Unvouchered/ MAP-V0207 |
Comparative data for other species were obtained from the available literature (see
Release call of Phyllomedusa bahiana, Phyllomedusa sauvagii, Pithecopus nordestinus, Pithecopus rohdei, and Pithecopus ayeaye. Values are presented as mean, ± SD (range), SD = standard deviation. SVL = snout vent-length.
Genus | Taxa/Acoustic parameters | SVL (mm) | n (calls) | Duration (s) | Pulses/call | Pulses/s | Dominant Frequency (Hz) | Reference |
Phyllomedusa | P. bahiana male 1 | 76.62 | 35 | 0.075 ± 0.005 (0.063–0.087) | 6 ± 0.37 (5–7) | 81 ± 4.25 (74–90) | 1071.43 ± 201.18 (750.00–1875.00) | This study |
P. bahiana male 2 | 72.74 | 18 | 0.073 ± 0.009 (0.062–0.096) | 6 ± 0.49 (5–7) | 83 ± 6.48 (66–92) | 895.83 ± 188.11 (562.50–1312.50) | This study | |
P. sauvagii | 77.95 | 33 | 0.087 ± 0.008 (0.078–0.107) | 6 ± 0.44 (6–7) | 72 ± 3.66 (61–78) | 798.67 ± 127.87 (516.80–1033.60) | This study | |
Pithecopus | P. nordestinus | – | 29 | 0.036 ± 0.008 (0.022–0.053) | 6 ± 0.86 (4–7) | 158 ± 18.06 (113–194) | 1508.81 ±187.92 (1378.10–2239.50) | This study |
P. rohdei | 39.30 | 18 | 0.043 ± 0.009 (0.034–0.070) | 4 ± 0.47 (3–5) | 92 ± 12.09 (71–118) | 1550.40 ± 350.82 (861. 30–1894.90) | This study | |
P. ayeaye | 31.28–36.60 | 113 | 0.051 ± 0.008 (0.031–0.072) | 9.5 ± 2.70 (5–17) | – | 1651.80 ± 612.90 (861.30–4651.20) |
|
The vocalizations were emitted in call series with irregular intervals between calls, while we stimulated the individual. The release call of Phyllomedusa bahiana had an ascendant amplitude modulation and slight frequency modulation, in which the band of frequency is narrower at the beginning and broader at the end. The call consists of a single pulsed note, with duration of 0.062–0.096 s, and dominant frequency of 562.50–1875.00 Hz. The number of pulses per call was 5–7, and the number of pulses per second (pulse/rate) was 66–92. The release call of P. sauvagii had an ascendant amplitude and frequency modulation on the first half of the call, and descendant in the end. The call consists of a single pulsed note, with duration of 0.078–0.107 s, and dominant frequency of 516.80–1033.60 Hz. The number of pulses per call was 6–7, and the number of pulses per second (pulse/rate) was 61–78. The release call of P. nordestinus had no amplitude and frequency modulation. The call consists of a single pulsed note, with duration of 0.022–0.053 s, and dominant frequency of 1378.10–2239.50 Hz. The number of pulses per call was 4–7, and the number of pulses per second (pulse/rate) was 113–194. The release call of P. rohdei had an ascendant amplitude and frequency modulation on the first half of the call, and descendant in the end, and had no frequency modulation. The call consists of a single pulsed note, with duration of 0.034–0.070 s, and dominant frequency of 861.30–1894.90 Hz. The number of pulses per call was 3–5, and the number of pulses per second (pulse/rate) was 71–118 (Fig.
Smaller species of the Pithecopus genus (P. ayeaye, P. rohdei and P. nordestinus), presented shorter release calls (0.022–0.070 s), with higher dominant frequency on average (1508.8–1651.8 Hz), when compared to the bigger species of the genus Phyllomedusa (P. bahiana and P. sauvagii) (0.062–0.107 s; 798.7–1071.4 Hz) (Table
Despite none release call of a phyllomedusid frog had been described (besides P. ayeaye), maybe this call type was confused with other distress calls. For example, the so-called “Territorial call II” described by
Release calls are emitted by males when they are inappropriately clasped by males, or by females when they are unreceptive, which affirms this type of call as a signal for sex recognition (
Although we observed some differences in the release call in different genera within Phyllomedusidae (i.e. Phyllomedusa and Pithecopus), the calls are similar between species of the same genus (e.g. Phyllomedusa bahiana vs. P. sauvagii; Pithecopus nordestinus vs. P. rohdei vs. P. ayeaye). A similar pattern was also observed regarding the advertisement calls from others species belonging to the Phyllomedusidae family (e.g. Phyllomedusa burmeisteri vs. P. bahiana,
The description of release calls of other species of the family Phyllomedusidae is highly important, which combined with the advertisement call, can reveal its utility for phyllomedusid systematics, within the family and its groups. Besides, such descriptions provide data that can be useful in studies on diversity and evolution of phenotypic traits or even how such signals are used in inter and intra-specific interactions.
S Mângia thanks CAPES for her postdoctoral fellowship, EA Pereira and F Camurugi thank their current scholarship supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). DJ Santana thanks his research fellowship supported by CNPq (311492/2017-7). EA Pereira also thanks Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio) for issuing a collecting permision (54493-11). We thank P. Rocha for suggestions on the manuscript.