Research Article |
Corresponding author: Lei Shi ( leis@xjau.edu.cn ) Academic editor: Philipp Wagner
© 2024 Tao Liang, Qian-ru Liang, Jiang-miao Ran, Jing An, Ya-hui Huang, Peng Ding, Lei Shi.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Liang T, Liang Q-ru, Ran J-miao, An J, Huang Y-hui, Ding P, Shi L (2024) Hiding in the valley: a new national record of Ablepharus eremchenkoi, with rediscovery of Ablepharus alaicus in China: phylogeny, morphology and natural history notes. Herpetozoa 37: 95-105. https://doi.org/10.3897/herpetozoa.37.e116071
|
The genus Ablepharus Lichtenstein, 1823 contains the common snake-eyed skinks, distributed from southern Europe and northern Africa to eastern Asia. Ablepharus alaicus Elpatjevsky, 1901 inhabits Central Asia and, according to historical literature, was once recorded in north-western China. However, there are no voucher records of this species from China. Some populations of a subspecies of A. alaicus have been elevated to new species, for example, A. eremchenkoi (Panfilov, 1999). However, no detailed studies have been conducted. In August and September 2023, we captured sixteen and fourteen skink specimens from Wuqia County and Qapqal Xibe Autonomous County, respectively, in Xinjiang, northwest China. Morphological and phylogenetic comparisons showed that the skinks collected from these two locations belong to A. eremchenkoi and A. alaicus, respectively. In this study, we confirmed the first record of A. eremchenkoi in China, rediscovered A. alaicus, reported voucher records for these two skinks and reviewed the taxonomic history of Ablepharus in Xinjiang, northwest China.
Ablepharine skink, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, voucher records, Xinjiang
The Ablepharine is a widespread skink lineage distributed from Europe to Asia (
There are three subspecies of A. alaicus: A. A. alaicus Elpatjevsky, 1901; A. A. kucenkoi Nikolsky, 1902; and A. A. yakovlevae Eremchenko, 1983.
In 2022 and 2023, we observed skinks in Wuqia County, Kizilsu Kirgiz Autonomous Prefecture (KKAP) and Qapqal Xibe Autonomous County, Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture (IKAP), Xinjiang, China, locations in which we had not previously observed them. We subsequently captured skinks from these two locations and conducted morphological and phylogenetic analyses. The results suggest that the skinks from KKAP belonged to A. eremchenkoi, a new record for this species in China. The skinks from IKAP were A. alaicus, confirming the distribution of A. alaicus in Xinjiang, China. In this study, we present the first known records of A. eremchenkoi and A. alaicus with voucher specimens from within China. In addition, we provide detailed descriptions of the morphology, phylogeny and natural history notes.
On 8 and 9 August 2023, we collected sixteen specimens from three locations in Yuqitashi (40.1527°N, 74.6310°E, 3040 m elev.; 40.1495°N, 74.6335°E, 3032 m elev.; 40.13°N, 74.64°E, 3014 m elev.), Wuqia County, KKAP and Xinjiang, China (Fig.
All specimens were euthanised and muscle or liver samples were dissected from the specimens, preserved in 95% ethanol and stored at –20 °C. All specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and transferred to 75% ethanol for preservation. Liver and muscle tissues used for molecular analysis were preserved in 95% alcohol at –20 °C. All specimens were deposited at the Herpetological Museum, Xinjiang Agricultural University (XJAU), Urumuqi, Xinjiang, China.
Total DNA was extracted from tissue samples by using the Foregene Animal Tissue Genomic DNA Extraction Kit per the manufacturer’s instructions. We referred to the primer sequences used by (
Localities and GenBank accession numbers for all species used in this study.
Species | Country | ND2 | 16S | 12S | (ID) References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ablepharus | |||||
A. eremchenkoi | China | OR687189 | OR681490 | OR677923 | (XND20230808001) This study |
A. eremchenkoi | China | OR687188 | OR681492 | OR677924 | (XND20230809010) This study |
A. eremchenkoi | China | OR687190 | OR681491 | OR677925 | (XND20230808007) This study |
A. eremchenkoi | China | OR687191 | OR681493 | OR677926 | (XND20230808023) This study |
A. alaicus | China | OR687182 | OR681482 | OR677917 | (XND2023092701) This study |
A. alaicus | China | OR687183 | OR681483 | OR677918 | (XND2023092706) This study |
A. alaicus | China | OR687184 | OR681484 | OR677919 | (XND2023092711) This study |
A. alaicus | China | OR687185 | OR681485 | OR677920 | (XND2023092712) This study |
A. alaicus | China | OR687186 | OR681486 | OR677921 | (XND2023092713) This study |
A. alaicus | China | OR687187 | OR681487 | OR677922 | (XND2023092714) This study |
A. alaicus | Kyrgyzstan | MZ820276 | MZ790578 | MZ790566 | ( |
A. anatolicus | Turkey | MZ848096 | – | MZ827906 | ( |
A. bivittatus | Iran | – | MZ707375 | MZ707427 | ( |
A. budaki | Syria | – | AY561427 | MZ827907 | ( |
A. chernovi | Turkey | – | JX847534 | – | ( |
A. deserti | Kyrgyzstan | MZ820278 | MZ790580 | MZ790568 | ( |
A. deserti | China | – | This study | ||
A. eremchenkoi | Kyrgyzstan | MZ820277 | MZ790579 | MZ790567 | ( |
A. grayanus | – | – | MZ707422 | MZ707474 |
|
A. himalayanus | China | MN885892 | MN885892 | MN885892 | |
A. kitaibelii | Greece | MZ848097 | AY561380 | MZ827908 | ( |
A. ladacensis | China | MW111453 | – | MZ790569 | ( |
A. mahabharatus | Nepal | MZ820282 | MZ790598 | MZ790570 | ( |
A. nepalensis | Nepal | MZ820286 | MZ790602 | MZ790574 | ( |
A. pannonicus | Uzbekistan | MZ820287 | MZ790584 | MZ790575 | ( |
A. rueppellii | Israel | MZ848098 | KX591472 | MZ827909 | ( |
A. sikimmensis | Nepal | MZ820283 | MZ790601 | MZ790573 | ( |
Protoblepharus | |||||
P. apatani | India | MZ820288 | MZ790586 | MZ790576 | ( |
P. medogensis | China | MW111454 | – | – | ( |
P. nyingchiensis | China | MW183282 | – | – | ( |
Outgroup | |||||
Scincella reevesii | China | NC054206 | NC054206 | NC054206 | ( |
Details of the primers used in the study for PCR amplification and sequencing (
Gene | Primer name | Primer sequence (5′-3′) |
---|---|---|
16SrRNA | 16Sa | CGCCTGTTTATCAAAAACAT |
16Sb | CCGGTCTGAACTCAGATCACGT | |
12S rRNA | 12Sa | AAACTGGGATTAGATACCCCACTAT |
12Sb | GAGGGTGACGGGCGGTGTGT | |
ND2 | H4980_edite | ATTTTGCGTGTTTGTGTTTGGT |
L4437 | AAGCTTTCGGGCCCATACC |
All sequences were aligned and manually edited using SeqMan in DNASTAR (
We used p-distance (uncorrected) in MEGE 7.0 (
Measurements of seventeen morphological characteristics, selected from published literature, were recorded to the nearest 0.1 mm using digital calipers from Jiang-miao Ran (
All data used in this note can be found in the supporting information.
ML and BI phylogenetic trees were constructed, based on three mitochondrial genes (12S, 356 bp; 16S, 457 bp; ND2, 509 bp) from twenty species, with a total length of 1323 bp. The ML and BI analyses resulted in largely identical topologies (Fig.
Ablepharus was monophyletic (BI/ML:1/98) in the phylogenetic tree, forming a sister clade with Protoblepharus. The sample sequences of Groups IKAP and KKAP were clustered into a single clade, forming a strong monophyletic group, Group IKAP, BI/ML:1/100; Group KKAP, BI/ML:1/100. Group KKAP clustered with A. eremchenkoi with strong support (BI/ML:1/100). The A. alaicus clade formed a sister clade with A. nepalensis, A. mahabharatus and A. sikimmensis (BI/ML:0.58/60).
The uncorrected p-distance, based on 12S sequences, was up to 20%; based on 16S sequences, it was up to 20%; and, based on ND2 sequences, it was up to 27%. The uncorrected p-distance between Group KKAP and A. eremchenkoi was 1%/2%/2% in the 12S/16S/ND2 sequences, respectively and was less than 10% for A. alaicus 1, from Kyrgyzstan, 12S/16S/ND2: 4%/4%/9%. The uncorrected p-distance between Group IKAP and A. alaicus 2, from Kazakhstan, was 4% for the ND2 sequences. The results of the genetic distances (Suppl. material
Measurements (mm) and scale counts of adult Ablepharus eremchenkoi from Xinjiang, China. See Materials and Methods for abbreviations. * indicates dropped or regenerated tail.
ID | Sex | BM | SVL | HL | HW | HD | MW | ED | END | IND | AG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XND0808001 | Female | 3.173 | 54.2 | 9.3 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 29.4 |
XND0808002 | Female | 2.348 | 47.9 | 9.2 | 5.1 | 3. 9 | 4. 9 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 29.3 |
XND0808005 | Female | 2.381 | 47.6 | 8.2 | 5.5 | 3.6 | 5.2 | 1.3 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 27.9 |
XND0808007 | Male | 2.041 | 46.5 | 9.6 | 6.6 | 4.9 | 5.9 | 1.5 | 3.4 | 1.5 | 24.6 |
AW | FLL | HLL | TL | SC | VC | SL | T4lam | MBSR | NSR | ||
XND0808001 | 9.45 | 11.59 | 15.11 | 40.5 | 2 | 46 | 4 | 19 | 26 | 29 | |
XND0808002 | 8.8 | 12.28 | 16.01 | 44.2 | 2 | 46 | 4 | 19 | 26 | 25 | |
XND0808005 | 7.96 | 11.16 | 15.97 | 39 | 2 | 48 | 4 | 16 | 26 | 30 | |
XND0808007 | 6.23 | 12.66 | 15.94 | 35.3+ | 2 | 43 | 4/5 | 17 | 26 | 26 |
Descriptive statistics for female reproductive traits of Ablepharus eremchenkoi.
ID | Date | Post-oviposition Body Mass (g) | Litter Size | All Litter Mass (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
XND0808001 | 20230811 | 2.13 | 4 | 1.04 |
XND0808002 | 20230824 | 1.62 | 2 | 0.52 |
XND0808005 | 20230825 | 1.84 | 2 | 0.52 |
Measurements (mm) and scale counts of juveniles of Ablepharus eremchenkoi. See Materials and Methods for abbreviations.
ID | BM | SVL | HL | HW | HD | MW | ED | END | IND | AG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XND0808001-1 | 0.27 | 22.7 | 5.7 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 0.97 | 11.1 | |
XND0808001-2 | 0.26 | 22.2 | 6.1 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 1.04 | 12.7 | |
XND0808001-3 | 0.26 | 23 | 5.5 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.16 | 13.5 | |
XND0808001-4 | 0.25 | 21.7 | 6.3 | 3.7 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 11.6 | |
XND0808002-1 | 0.26 | 22.5 | 5.4 | 4.2 | 2.7 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.09 | 12.7 | |
XND0808002-2 | 0.27 | 24.1 | 5.5 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.01 | 12.3 | |
XND0808005-2 | 0.27 | 23.5 | 5.2 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 1.01 | 11.4 | |
XND0808005-1 | 0.25 | 23.4 | 5.3 | 3.7 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 1.03 | 11.1 | |
AW | FLL | HLL | TL | SC | VC | SL | T4lam | MBSR | NSR | ||
XND0808001-1 | 2.6 | 7.5 | 8.9 | 25.0 | 2 | 45 | 4 | 19 | 29 | 27 | |
XND0808001-2 | 2.8 | 6.5 | 8.7 | 25.8 | 2 | 42 | 4 | 18 | 27 | 28 | |
XND0808001-3 | 2.9 | 7.7 | 9.8 | 25.6 | 2 | 45 | 4 | 19 | 27 | 26 | |
XND0808001-4 | 3.2 | 7.9 | 9.7 | 26.7 | 2 | 43 | 4 | 19 | 29 | 28 | |
XND0808002-1 | 2.8 | 7.9 | 10.1 | 26.3 | 2 | 48 | 4 | 17 | 28 | 27 | |
XND0808002-2 | 3.2 | 7.4 | 10.2 | 19.4 | 2 | 46 | 4 | 19 | 28 | 28 | |
XND0808005-1 | 3.3 | 8.1 | 9.7 | 26.7 | 2 | 40 | 4 | 19 | 28 | 28 | |
XND0808005-2 | 3.4 | 8.1 | 9.3 | 25.3 | 2 | 42 | 4 | 19 | 27 | 28 |
叶氏泛蜥 (Yè Shì Fàn Xī).
The sample size comprised 16 specimens, all collected by Lei Shi, Jing An and Tao Liang. The main description of this species is based on the male specimen (XND0808007; Figs
Morphologies of the remaining specimens were similar to those four adult specimens; these data are in Suppl. material
The recorded characteristics of the specimen were as follows: body was small, nearly uniform in thickness, with SVL 46.5 mm and mass 2.04 g and slender (BW/SVL ratio 0.11) with an elongated trunk (AG/SVL ratio 0.53); imbricate scales were smooth and glossy; snout was slightly pointed; head was small and longer than it was wide (HL 9.6 mm, HW 6.6 mm, HD 4.9 mm); eyes were small; ED external ear opening was small with obviously projecting lobules; END was 3.4 mm; fore-limbs and hind-limbs were relatively short, the fore-limb was shorter than the hind-limb (FLL/HLL ratio 0.79) and the tips of the digits of the fore-limb and hind-limb met when the limbs were adpressed against each other along the body axis (except for XND20230808001); the tail was broken, but had regenerated and the regenerated tail was narrower than the body (4.6 mm cf. 6.2 mm) and was shorter than SVL (35.3 mm cf. 46.5 mm) despite tails generally being longer than SVL.
The width of the rostral was greater than its height and it was in contact with the first supralabials, nasals,and fronto-nasal. Nostrils were circular and located at the centre of the nasal cavity. Frontal, fronto-nasal and a pair of prefrontals were connected to a point (seven of sixteen individuals); four of sixteen individuals’ prefrontals were widely in contact with each other and frontal and frontal-nasal were separate from each other; three of sixteen individuals’ frontal and frontal-nasasl were widely in contact with each other, prefrontals were separate from each other; two of sixteen individuals had three prefrontals, which made frontal and frontal-nasal separate from each other. Prefrontal fan-shaped, a pair of prefrontals were in contact with the postnasal, loreal and first supraocular. A large single frontal, irregularly wedge-shaped, was in broad contact with the third and fourth supraoculars and a pair of frontoparietal posterolaterally. Frontoparietal were widely in contact with parietal and interparietal scales and third and fourth supraoculars. The interparietal rhomboid was posteriorly in contact with parietals. Parietals were anteriorly in contact with frontoparietal, interparietal and fifth supraocular and were laterally touching the upper posterior temporals. Three supraoculars and the eyes were surrounded by a circle of tiny irregular scales. There were four scales between the nasal cavity and eyes and one individual (XND20230808019) had five scales. For seven supralabials, there was a tiny supraocular between the second and third scales (Figs
Colouration in life: Overall, in the one male, the dorsal was coppery brown; dark longitudinal spots were present on the edges of scales and generated three irregular black lines continuing on to the tail. White dots were grouped into six irregular lines along the back of them; the two external dots merged into light lines on the dorsal sides (Fig.
Activity, habitats and distribution. All 16 specimens were collected during the day: 16:00–18:00 h and 11:30–13:00 h. According to the residents, these regions receive snow from September to May; thus, the activity times ranged probably from May to August. These individuals were collected at the bottom of a hill, from under rocks and some individuals were collected from riverbeds, 40.20°N, 74.56°E, 3133 m elev., (observations from Ya-hui Huang). This species was observed in Wuqia County, China. Except for Yuqitashi, where we obtained the specimen, this species has been observed in Kalatashi, at 40.0559°N, 74.5941°E and 3004 m elev. and in Jigen Village, at 39.82°N, 74.1069°E and 2709 m elev., identified by images provided by Ya-hui Huang and Jin-Xin Gu, respectively. All individuals were located in a continuous valley (Fig.
Viviparity. Of these individuals, three were gravid females, one female (XND0808001) laid four litters on the morning of 11 August 2023 and two females (XND0808002 and XND0808005) laid two litters on 23 and 24 August (Tables
阿赖山泛蜥 (Ā Lài Shān Fàn Xī).
The sample size comprised 14 specimens, all specimens were collected by Peng Ding, Lin Leng and Ke-fan Wu. The main descriptions of this species were based on one specimen (XND2023092704). Additional descriptions were based on the other 13 specimens (in parentheses). All specimen morphological data is in the Suppl. material
The body was small and nearly uniform in thickness, SVL 60.4 mm (26.1–51.1 mm); body mass was 2.93 g (0.29–2.24 g); eyes were small, ED 1.77 mm (1–1.5 mm); END 2.9 mm (1.7–3.3 mm); IND 2.37 mm (1.1–2.3 mm); the head was small, but longer than its width or depth, HL 11.97 mm (6.2–12.5 mm); HW 7.28 mm (3.8–6.9 mm); HD 6.5 mm (2.5–4.7 mm); AG 34.13 mm (14.1–33.1 mm); body was slender (BW/SVL ratio 0.17, 0.12–0.17) with an elongated trunk (AG/SVL ratio 0.56, 0.45–0.64); tail, broken or regenerated tails were excluded, was not as wide (TBW, 5.2 mm, 2.3–5.2 mm) as the trunk, but was longer (64.5 mm, 24.7–55.4 mm) than SVL (TL/SVL ratio 1.06, 0.94–1.17). Limbs were short, FLL 12.53 mm (8.1–12.7 mm) and HLL 16.45 mm (9.5–15.8 mm); the tips of the digits of the fore-limb and hind-limb did not meet each other when the limbs were adpressed against each other along the body axis, but for twelve of fourteen individuals they did meet each other. The lengths of the digits (measurements in parentheses) were as follows: left manus IV (2.68) > III (2.65) > II (1.91) > V (1.6) > I (1); left pes IV (5.07) > III (3.26) > V (2.8) > II (2.15) > I (0.95).
The rostral was single; wider than it was high; and was in contact with the first supralabials, nasals and frontonasals. The nasal rhomboid comprised circular nostrils, located at the centre of the nasal cavity. Fronto-nasal was fan-shaped and connected to the prefrontals. Prefrontals were pentagonal, a pair of prefrontals were connected with a border between them, located between the fronto-nasal and frontal (seven of fourteen individuals); three of the 14 individuals had frontals, fronto-nasals and a pair of prefrontals connected by a point; 3 of the 14 individuals had the frontal and frontal-nasal widely in contact with each other and the prefrontals were separate from each other. The frontal was wedge-shaped, which contacts with the prefrontals, the third and fourth supraoculars and a pair of frontoparietals posterolaterally. Six of the 14 individuals had frontals in contact with fronto-nasals, the prefrontals were not in contact with each other. The second supraocular region, in contact with the frontal and prefrontal regions, was a single tiny supracular hexagon, between the second supraocular and prefrontal regions. A pair of frontoparietals were in broad contact with each other; besides each frontoparietal was in contact with the frontal, third, fourth supraoculars, the parietal and interparietal. The interparietal rhomboid, in contrast with the frontoparietals, was posteriorly in contact with the parietals. A pair of parietals contact each other; additionally, each parietal was in contact with the interparietal, frontoparietal, fourth supracular and temporals. There were three scales between the nasal cavity and eyes; 10 of the individuals had at least four scales on one side. There were seven supralabials, four loreals between the nasal and eyes and a fourth tiny loreal. The specimen had seven infralabials; three individuals had six infralabials on each side. The temporal 1+2 and the second subtemporal were large and trapezoidal. The mental was wider than long, in contact with the first infralabial laterally and postmental posteriorly. There was a single, large postmental with four pairs of large chin-shields; the first pair was in contact with the second pair narrowly separated by a single medial scale. Dorsal scalation was homogeneous with four columns; there were longitudinal scale rows at mid-body 25 (25–28). There were 28 (25–29) scales around the middle of the neck and 50 (42 –51) ventral scales. There were 17 toe IV lamellae.
Colouration in life. The back was coppery brown, with dark longitudinal spots on the edges of the scales, which generated three black lines continuing on-to the tail; there were white longitudinal spots in the middle of the scales, generating three irregular lines continuing to the back of the tail base. A dark sooty area on each side was sharply defined above, but faded below the belly. The dark sooty area began after the nasal cavity and ended at the middle of the tail (Fig.
The general aspect and close-up views of Ablepharus alaicus (XND2023092704) in life from Qapqal Xibe Autonomous County, Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture, Xinjiang, China. A. Dorsolateral view of body; B. Ventral view of body; C. Dorsal view of head; D. Right side view of head; E. Ventral view of head. Photos by: Wei-Zhen Gao.
Viviparity. All fourteen specimens were collected during the day, from 12:00 to 18:00 h; therefore, this species appears to be diurnal. These individuals were collected at the bottom of a hill at an altitude of 2466 m and the microhabitats were covered with shrubs and gravel. Their diet remains poorly understood, but they are thought to be carnivorous. This species has been observed in Qapqal Xibe Autonomous County, China and probably in adjacent Zhaosu County, which, along with Tianshan, has populations that are connected to those in Kazakhstan (Fig.
There have been long-standing questions on the generic taxonomy of Ablepharine skinks (
The distribution of A. A. kucenkoi is around north-eastern Tianshan, including south-eastern Kazakhstan, north-eastern Kyrgyzstan and the Ili Valley of Xinjiang (
Xinjiang covers one-sixth of China’s territory; however, it remains the least studied area in China for reptiles. For example, the checklist of lizards in China has increased by almost 60 species since 2015 (
In summary, we identified the distribution of A. alaicus and A. eremchenkoi in Xinjiang, northwest China. These records indicate that the number of skink species in Xinjiang ranges from two to three. We also reported the phylogeny, morphology and natural historical notes of these two species.
We thank Philipp Wagner and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on a previous draft of this manuscript, Anna Zimin for providing and translating Russian references. We also thank Editage for language editing service and Ju-xin Gu for providing his field observation.This work was supported by the Third Xinjiang Scientific Expedition Program [2022xjkk1200] and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [32260527 and 31660613].
Best models for the three sequences
Data type: docx
Average uncorrected p-distances (percentages) between Ablepharus
Data type: xlsx
Morphological traits of all individuals included in this study
Data type: xlsx