Research Article
Print
Research Article
Hiding in the valley: a new national record of Ablepharus eremchenkoi, with rediscovery of Ablepharus alaicus in China: phylogeny, morphology and natural history notes
expand article infoTao Liang§, Qian-ru Liang, Jiang-miao Ran, Jing An|, Ya-hui Huang, Peng Ding, Lei Shi
‡ Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumuqi, China
§ Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumuqi, China
¶ Urumqi Saybagh District Wildschool Conservation and Education Center, Urumuqi, China
Open Access

Abstract

The genus Ablepharus Lichtenstein, 1823 contains the common snake-eyed skinks, distributed from southern Europe and northern Africa to eastern Asia. Ablepharus alaicus Elpatjevsky, 1901 inhabits Central Asia and, according to historical literature, was once recorded in north-western China. However, there are no voucher records of this species from China. Some populations of a subspecies of A. alaicus have been elevated to new species, for example, A. eremchenkoi (Panfilov, 1999). However, no detailed studies have been conducted. In August and September 2023, we captured sixteen and fourteen skink specimens from Wuqia County and Qapqal Xibe Autonomous County, respectively, in Xinjiang, northwest China. Morphological and phylogenetic comparisons showed that the skinks collected from these two locations belong to A. eremchenkoi and A. alaicus, respectively. In this study, we confirmed the first record of A. eremchenkoi in China, rediscovered A. alaicus, reported voucher records for these two skinks and reviewed the taxonomic history of Ablepharus in Xinjiang, northwest China.

Key Words

Ablepharine skink, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, voucher records, Xinjiang

Introduction

The Ablepharine is a widespread skink lineage distributed from Europe to Asia (Vaissi et al. 2023). Asymblepharus Eremchenko & Shcherbak, 1986 and Himalblepharus Eremchenko, 1987 were established as separate genera from Ablepharus Lichtenstein, 1823, based on morphological divergence. In a recent revision of Ablepharine skinks, Mirza et al. (2022) proposed treating Asymblepharus and Himalblepharus as subjective junior synonyms of Ablepharus because both are embedded within Ablepharus, which does not have a movable eyelid. This returns species belonging to these two genera to Ablepharus sensu lato, including Asymblepharus alaicus, which are mainly distributed in Central Asia in Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan and China.

There are three subspecies of A. alaicus: A. A. alaicus Elpatjevsky, 1901; A. A. kucenkoi Nikolsky, 1902; and A. A. yakovlevae Eremchenko, 1983. Panfilov (1999) evaluated some populations of A. A. yakovlevae as A. eremchenkoi, based on variations in reproductive traits. Two subspecies were thought to be distributed in China (Zhao et al. 1999). Of these, A. A. kucenkoi was distributed in the Ili Region of Xinjiang; this record was based on two specimens not preserved in China (Eremchenko and Shcherbak 1986). A. A. alaicus was thought to be distributed near the south-western Xinjiang border close to Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, but no voucher specimens are available to support this distribution. Notably, historical records of A. alaicus in China have not been confirmed.

In 2022 and 2023, we observed skinks in Wuqia County, Kizilsu Kirgiz Autonomous Prefecture (KKAP) and Qapqal Xibe Autonomous County, Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture (IKAP), Xinjiang, China, locations in which we had not previously observed them. We subsequently captured skinks from these two locations and conducted morphological and phylogenetic analyses. The results suggest that the skinks from KKAP belonged to A. eremchenkoi, a new record for this species in China. The skinks from IKAP were A. alaicus, confirming the distribution of A. alaicus in Xinjiang, China. In this study, we present the first known records of A. eremchenkoi and A. alaicus with voucher specimens from within China. In addition, we provide detailed descriptions of the morphology, phylogeny and natural history notes.

Materials and methods

Species delimitation

On 8 and 9 August 2023, we collected sixteen specimens from three locations in Yuqitashi (40.1527°N, 74.6310°E, 3040 m elev.; 40.1495°N, 74.6335°E, 3032 m elev.; 40.13°N, 74.64°E, 3014 m elev.), Wuqia County, KKAP and Xinjiang, China (Fig. 1). On 27 September 2023, we collected fourteen specimens close to Baishifeng (43.43°N, 81.05°E, 2466 m elev.), Qapqal Xibe Autonomous County (IKAP) (Fig. 1). All thirty specimens were transported to Xinjiang Agricultural University.

Figure 1. 

Map showing the distribution of A. eremchenkoi and A. alaicus within China. The distribution map of A. alaicus was obtained from the IUCN Red List (Accessed on 17 September 2023). Photos by Lei Shi, Lin Leng and Tao Liang.

All specimens were euthanised and muscle or liver samples were dissected from the specimens, preserved in 95% ethanol and stored at –20 °C. All specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and transferred to 75% ethanol for preservation. Liver and muscle tissues used for molecular analysis were preserved in 95% alcohol at –20 °C. All specimens were deposited at the Herpetological Museum, Xinjiang Agricultural University (XJAU), Urumuqi, Xinjiang, China.

Sequence extraction

Total DNA was extracted from tissue samples by using the Foregene Animal Tissue Genomic DNA Extraction Kit per the manufacturer’s instructions. We referred to the primer sequences used by (Mirza et al. 2022). Additionally, we sequenced partial segments of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA (16S), 12S rRNA (12S) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2) (Tables 1, 2). The PCR reaction volume was 25 μl, containing 1 μl template DNA, 1 μl each of upstream and downstream primers, 12.5 μl 2× Taq PCR Mix and 9.5 μl ddH2O. The PCR protocol used for amplification was as follows: 95 ℃ for 3 min, (denaturation temperature 95 ℃ for 30 s, annealing time ranged from 40 to 50 s, elongation temperature 72 ℃ for 1 min) × 36 cycles, 72 ℃ for 10 min, hold at 4 ℃ (Mirza et al. 2022). Gel electrophoresis was performed using 0.5% TBE solution and agarose to verify successful amplification of the samples. Subsequently, the successfully amplified PCR stock solution was sent to Sangon Biotechnology for purification and sequencing.

Table 1.

Localities and GenBank accession numbers for all species used in this study.

Species Country ND2 16S 12S (ID) References
Ablepharus
A. eremchenkoi China OR687189 OR681490 OR677923 (XND20230808001) This study
A. eremchenkoi China OR687188 OR681492 OR677924 (XND20230809010) This study
A. eremchenkoi China OR687190 OR681491 OR677925 (XND20230808007) This study
A. eremchenkoi China OR687191 OR681493 OR677926 (XND20230808023) This study
A. alaicus China OR687182 OR681482 OR677917 (XND2023092701) This study
A. alaicus China OR687183 OR681483 OR677918 (XND2023092706) This study
A. alaicus China OR687184 OR681484 OR677919 (XND2023092711) This study
A. alaicus China OR687185 OR681485 OR677920 (XND2023092712) This study
A. alaicus China OR687186 OR681486 OR677921 (XND2023092713) This study
A. alaicus China OR687187 OR681487 OR677922 (XND2023092714) This study
A. alaicus Kyrgyzstan MZ820276 MZ790578 MZ790566 (Mirza et al. 2022)
A. anatolicus Turkey MZ848096 MZ827906 (Mirza et al. 2022)
A. bivittatus Iran MZ707375 MZ707427 (Karamiani et al. 2021)
A. budaki Syria AY561427 MZ827907 (Poulakakis et al. 2005; Mirza et al. 2022)
A. chernovi Turkey JX847534 (Poulakakis et al. 2013)
A. deserti Kyrgyzstan MZ820278 MZ790580 MZ790568 (Mirza et al. 2022)
A. deserti China This study
A. eremchenkoi Kyrgyzstan MZ820277 MZ790579 MZ790567 (Mirza et al. 2022)
A. grayanus MZ707422 MZ707474 Karamiani et al. 2021
A. himalayanus China MN885892 MN885892 MN885892
A. kitaibelii Greece MZ848097 AY561380 MZ827908 (Mirza et al. 2022)
A. ladacensis China MW111453 MZ790569 (Xu et al. 2021; Mirza et al. 2022)
A. mahabharatus Nepal MZ820282 MZ790598 MZ790570 (Mirza et al. 2022)
A. nepalensis Nepal MZ820286 MZ790602 MZ790574 (Mirza et al. 2022)
A. pannonicus Uzbekistan MZ820287 MZ790584 MZ790575 (Mirza et al. 2022)
A. rueppellii Israel MZ848098 KX591472 MZ827909 (Skourtanioti et al. 2016; Mirza et al. 2022)
A. sikimmensis Nepal MZ820283 MZ790601 MZ790573 (Mirza et al. 2022)
Protoblepharus
P. apatani India MZ820288 MZ790586 MZ790576 (Mirza et al. 2022)
P. medogensis China MW111454 (Che et al. 2020)
P. nyingchiensis China MW183282 (Che et al. 2020)
Outgroup
Scincella reevesii China NC054206 NC054206 NC054206 (Zhong et al. 2021)
Table 2.

Details of the primers used in the study for PCR amplification and sequencing (Mirza et al. 2022).

Gene Primer name Primer sequence (5′-3′)
16SrRNA 16Sa CGCCTGTTTATCAAAAACAT
16Sb CCGGTCTGAACTCAGATCACGT
12S rRNA 12Sa AAACTGGGATTAGATACCCCACTAT
12Sb GAGGGTGACGGGCGGTGTGT
ND2 H4980_edite ATTTTGCGTGTTTGTGTTTGGT
L4437 AAGCTTTCGGGCCCATACC

Molecular data and analyses

All sequences were aligned and manually edited using SeqMan in DNASTAR (Burland 1999). Sequences were aligned in Mega 7.0 (Kumar et al. 2016) using ClustalW (Thompson et al. 1994) with default settings. Ultimately, a 12S sequence of approximately 356 bp, a 16S sequence of 389 bp, an ND2 sequence of 509 bp and a spliced sequence of 1323 bp were obtained. We collected reference sequences of the same genus from GenBank, with Scincella reevesii as the outgroup and constructed a phylogenetic tree of Ablepharus and its species within the genus by using Bayesian Inference (BI) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) to explore the affinities of the sample sequences in Ablepharus. The BI and ML analyses were performed using MrBayes and IQ-TREE in PhyloSuite (Zhang et al. 2020) with default parameters, respectively. The resulting phylogenetic tree was visualised using FigTree v.1.4.3 and the effective sample size (ESS) was assessed using Tracer 1.7.2 (Rambaut et al. 2018), with all ESS values for parameters > 200. Finally, the phylogenetic tree was visualised using ITOL v.6 (Letunic and Bork 2021). A posteriori probability (BPP) or ML bootstrap value (BS) > 95% was considered strong support for monophyly.

We used p-distance (uncorrected) in MEGE 7.0 (Kumar et al. 2016) to calculate the genetic distances of the three sequences: 12S, 16S and ND2. We divided the sample and reference sequences into groups by using MEGA and p-distance to calculate genetic distances amongst the three gene sequences.

Morphological data and analyses

Measurements of seventeen morphological characteristics, selected from published literature, were recorded to the nearest 0.1 mm using digital calipers from Jiang-miao Ran (Zhao et al. 1999; Qi et al. 2022). These characteristics were : snout-vent length (SVL), distance from tip of snout to vent ; head length (HL), distance from the tip of the snout to the posterior border of the collar ; head width (HW), distance across the widest point of the head ; head depth (HD), highest point of the head ; axilla-groin distance (AG), distance between posterior edge of fore-limb insertion and anterior edge of hind-limb insertion ; fore-limb length (FLL), distance from fore-limb insertion to the longest digit ; hind-limb length (HLL), distance from hind-limb insertion to the longest digit ; tail length (TL), distance between the cloaca and the tail top ; eye diameter (ED) ; eye-narial distance (END), from anterior margin of eye to posterior margin of nares ; internarial distance (IND), distance between the nares ; supraocular count (SC) ; supralabial count (SL), supralabial count before eyes ; ventral count (VC), number of latitudinal scale columns from the midpoint of the fore-limb base to the cloaca ; toe IV lamellae count (T4lam), number of enlarged, undivided lamellae beneath Toe IV ; mid-body scale-row count (MBSR), number of longitudinal scale rows measured around the mid-body ; and neck scale-row count (NSR), number of longitudinal scale rows measured around the neck.

Data availability statement

All data used in this note can be found in the supporting information.

Results

ML and BI phylogenetic trees were constructed, based on three mitochondrial genes (12S, 356 bp; 16S, 457 bp; ND2, 509 bp) from twenty species, with a total length of 1323 bp. The ML and BI analyses resulted in largely identical topologies (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. 

Bayesian phylogenetic trees depicting the relationships amongst Ablepharus species using tandem sequences (12S, 16S, ND2). (Note: The values of nodes nearby indicate BI/ML).

Ablepharus was monophyletic (BI/ML:1/98) in the phylogenetic tree, forming a sister clade with Protoblepharus. The sample sequences of Groups IKAP and KKAP were clustered into a single clade, forming a strong monophyletic group, Group IKAP, BI/ML:1/100; Group KKAP, BI/ML:1/100. Group KKAP clustered with A. eremchenkoi with strong support (BI/ML:1/100). The A. alaicus clade formed a sister clade with A. nepalensis, A. mahabharatus and A. sikimmensis (BI/ML:0.58/60).

The uncorrected p-distance, based on 12S sequences, was up to 20%; based on 16S sequences, it was up to 20%; and, based on ND2 sequences, it was up to 27%. The uncorrected p-distance between Group KKAP and A. eremchenkoi was 1%/2%/2% in the 12S/16S/ND2 sequences, respectively and was less than 10% for A. alaicus 1, from Kyrgyzstan, 12S/16S/ND2: 4%/4%/9%. The uncorrected p-distance between Group IKAP and A. alaicus 2, from Kazakhstan, was 4% for the ND2 sequences. The results of the genetic distances (Suppl. material 2) were consistent with the results of the phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 2), where the Groups IKAP and KKAP were clustered into a branch with A. eremchenkoi and A. alaicus and the genetic distances of all four (Groups IKAP, Groups KKAP, A. eremchenkoi and A. alaicus) were lower than those of other species of the same genus, indicating the closeness of the relationship between them. All newly-collected specimens were largely similar to specimens of the original description of A. eremchenkoi and A. alaicus (Tables 35). Thus, we report the rediscovery of A. alaicus and specimens from the KKAP (A. eremchenkoi) as a new record in China.

Table 3.

Measurements (mm) and scale counts of adult Ablepharus eremchenkoi from Xinjiang, China. See Materials and Methods for abbreviations. * indicates dropped or regenerated tail.

ID Sex BM SVL HL HW HD MW ED END IND AG
XND0808001 Female 3.173 54.2 9.3 6.1 4.2 5.8 1.6 2.1 1.7 29.4
XND0808002 Female 2.348 47.9 9.2 5.1 3. 9 4. 9 1.4 2.8 1.2 29.3
XND0808005 Female 2.381 47.6 8.2 5.5 3.6 5.2 1.3 3.2 1.4 27.9
XND0808007 Male 2.041 46.5 9.6 6.6 4.9 5.9 1.5 3.4 1.5 24.6
AW FLL HLL TL SC VC SL T4lam MBSR NSR
XND0808001 9.45 11.59 15.11 40.5 2 46 4 19 26 29
XND0808002 8.8 12.28 16.01 44.2 2 46 4 19 26 25
XND0808005 7.96 11.16 15.97 39 2 48 4 16 26 30
XND0808007 6.23 12.66 15.94 35.3+ 2 43 4/5 17 26 26
Table 4.

Descriptive statistics for female reproductive traits of Ablepharus eremchenkoi.

ID Date Post-oviposition Body Mass (g) Litter Size All Litter Mass (g)
XND0808001 20230811 2.13 4 1.04
XND0808002 20230824 1.62 2 0.52
XND0808005 20230825 1.84 2 0.52
Table 5.

Measurements (mm) and scale counts of juveniles of Ablepharus eremchenkoi. See Materials and Methods for abbreviations.

ID BM SVL HL HW HD MW ED END IND AG
XND0808001-1 0.27 22.7 5.7 3.8 2.4 3.5 1.2 1.7 0.97 11.1
XND0808001-2 0.26 22.2 6.1 3.5 2.6 3.2 1.1 1.7 1.04 12.7
XND0808001-3 0.26 23 5.5 3.7 2.5 3.2 1.1 2.1 1.16 13.5
XND0808001-4 0.25 21.7 6.3 3.7 2.4 3.3 1.3 1.9 1.1 11.6
XND0808002-1 0.26 22.5 5.4 4.2 2.7 3.6 0.9 1.3 1.09 12.7
XND0808002-2 0.27 24.1 5.5 3.7 2.5 3.2 1.1 1.5 1.01 12.3
XND0808005-2 0.27 23.5 5.2 3.5 2.4 3.4 1.1 1.9 1.01 11.4
XND0808005-1 0.25 23.4 5.3 3.7 2.2 3.4 1.1 1.9 1.03 11.1
AW FLL HLL TL SC VC SL T4lam MBSR NSR
XND0808001-1 2.6 7.5 8.9 25.0 2 45 4 19 29 27
XND0808001-2 2.8 6.5 8.7 25.8 2 42 4 18 27 28
XND0808001-3 2.9 7.7 9.8 25.6 2 45 4 19 27 26
XND0808001-4 3.2 7.9 9.7 26.7 2 43 4 19 29 28
XND0808002-1 2.8 7.9 10.1 26.3 2 48 4 17 28 27
XND0808002-2 3.2 7.4 10.2 19.4 2 46 4 19 28 28
XND0808005-1 3.3 8.1 9.7 26.7 2 40 4 19 28 28
XND0808005-2 3.4 8.1 9.3 25.3 2 42 4 19 27 28

Description of specimens from China

Ablepharus eremchenkoi (Panfilov, 1999)

Chinese names

叶氏泛蜥 (Yè Shì Fàn Xī).

Description of specimens from China

The sample size comprised 16 specimens, all collected by Lei Shi, Jing An and Tao Liang. The main description of this species is based on the male specimen (XND0808007; Figs 3, 4) whose tail had been naturally regenerated. Data and descriptions of the three female specimens (XND0808001, 002 and 005) are provided in parentheses in the following text (if different). The data available for the four voucher specimens are listed in Table 3.

Figure 3. 

Ablepharus eremchenkoi male (A, B) and female (C, D) in life. Photos by: Tao Liang.

Figure 4. 

Schematic representation of head scalation of Ablepharus eremchenkoi. A. Lateral view; B. Dorsal view; C. Ventral view. The plots were based on the male (XND0808007), the grey scale was the mutational scale between the second and third scales on the right side.

Morphologies of the remaining specimens were similar to those four adult specimens; these data are in Suppl. material 3.

The recorded characteristics of the specimen were as follows: body was small, nearly uniform in thickness, with SVL 46.5 mm and mass 2.04 g and slender (BW/SVL ratio 0.11) with an elongated trunk (AG/SVL ratio 0.53); imbricate scales were smooth and glossy; snout was slightly pointed; head was small and longer than it was wide (HL 9.6 mm, HW 6.6 mm, HD 4.9 mm); eyes were small; ED external ear opening was small with obviously projecting lobules; END was 3.4 mm; fore-limbs and hind-limbs were relatively short, the fore-limb was shorter than the hind-limb (FLL/HLL ratio 0.79) and the tips of the digits of the fore-limb and hind-limb met when the limbs were adpressed against each other along the body axis (except for XND20230808001); the tail was broken, but had regenerated and the regenerated tail was narrower than the body (4.6 mm cf. 6.2 mm) and was shorter than SVL (35.3 mm cf. 46.5 mm) despite tails generally being longer than SVL.

The width of the rostral was greater than its height and it was in contact with the first supralabials, nasals,and fronto-nasal. Nostrils were circular and located at the centre of the nasal cavity. Frontal, fronto-nasal and a pair of prefrontals were connected to a point (seven of sixteen individuals); four of sixteen individuals’ prefrontals were widely in contact with each other and frontal and frontal-nasal were separate from each other; three of sixteen individuals’ frontal and frontal-nasasl were widely in contact with each other, prefrontals were separate from each other; two of sixteen individuals had three prefrontals, which made frontal and frontal-nasal separate from each other. Prefrontal fan-shaped, a pair of prefrontals were in contact with the postnasal, loreal and first supraocular. A large single frontal, irregularly wedge-shaped, was in broad contact with the third and fourth supraoculars and a pair of frontoparietal posterolaterally. Frontoparietal were widely in contact with parietal and interparietal scales and third and fourth supraoculars. The interparietal rhomboid was posteriorly in contact with parietals. Parietals were anteriorly in contact with frontoparietal, interparietal and fifth supraocular and were laterally touching the upper posterior temporals. Three supraoculars and the eyes were surrounded by a circle of tiny irregular scales. There were four scales between the nasal cavity and eyes and one individual (XND20230808019) had five scales. For seven supralabials, there was a tiny supraocular between the second and third scales (Figs 3, 4) on the right side (Fig. 4) and seven infralabials. The mental was wider than it was long and was in contact with the first infralabial laterally, postmental posteriorly. Postmental was large and single; four pairs of large chin-shields were present, with the first pair in contact and the second pair narrowly separated by a single medial scale. Dorsal scalation was homogeneous with four columns; longitudinal scale rows were at mid-body 26 (25–29). Twenty-six scales were around the middle of the neck. The number of ventral scales was 43 (46–48). The lengths of the digits (measurements in mm in parentheses) were as follows: left manus IV (2.84) > III (2.69) > II (1.82) > V (1.46) > I (0.98); left pes IV (4.99) > III (3.46) > V (2.31) > II (1.96) > I (1.07). Toe IV lamellae 17.

Colouration in life: Overall, in the one male, the dorsal was coppery brown; dark longitudinal spots were present on the edges of scales and generated three irregular black lines continuing on to the tail. White dots were grouped into six irregular lines along the back of them; the two external dots merged into light lines on the dorsal sides (Fig. 4). The lines on the dorsal sides began at the nasal base until the tail base and they were filled with rare light dots (Fig. 4). The bottom half of the dorsal side was white. The male abdomen was orange-red to the tail, but not the regenerated tail. Females and males were coloured similarly, but the abdomen was paler for females than males; the outline of ventrals was black; and subadults and juveniles had abdomens similar to females, but without the orange-red colour.

Activity, habitats and distribution. All 16 specimens were collected during the day: 16:00–18:00 h and 11:30–13:00 h. According to the residents, these regions receive snow from September to May; thus, the activity times ranged probably from May to August. These individuals were collected at the bottom of a hill, from under rocks and some individuals were collected from riverbeds, 40.20°N, 74.56°E, 3133 m elev., (observations from Ya-hui Huang). This species was observed in Wuqia County, China. Except for Yuqitashi, where we obtained the specimen, this species has been observed in Kalatashi, at 40.0559°N, 74.5941°E and 3004 m elev. and in Jigen Village, at 39.82°N, 74.1069°E and 2709 m elev., identified by images provided by Ya-hui Huang and Jin-Xin Gu, respectively. All individuals were located in a continuous valley (Fig. 1), with altitude ranging from 2709 m to 3133 m (Fig. 1).

Reproduction and diet

Viviparity. Of these individuals, three were gravid females, one female (XND0808001) laid four litters on the morning of 11 August 2023 and two females (XND0808002 and XND0808005) laid two litters on 23 and 24 August (Tables 4, 5) in the laboratory. On average, for these young, weight was 0.26 g, SVL was 22.9 mm and TL was 25.2 mm (Suppl. material 3). Juveniles were coloured and morphologically similar to adults, but had no orange-red colour on their abdomens. The diet of this species remains poorly understood, but they are thought to be carnivorous.

Ablepharus alaicus Elpatjevsky, 1901

Chinese names

阿赖山泛蜥 (Ā Lài Shān Fàn Xī).

Description of specimens from China

The sample size comprised 14 specimens, all specimens were collected by Peng Ding, Lin Leng and Ke-fan Wu. The main descriptions of this species were based on one specimen (XND2023092704). Additional descriptions were based on the other 13 specimens (in parentheses). All specimen morphological data is in the Suppl. material 3.

The body was small and nearly uniform in thickness, SVL 60.4 mm (26.1–51.1 mm); body mass was 2.93 g (0.29–2.24 g); eyes were small, ED 1.77 mm (1–1.5 mm); END 2.9 mm (1.7–3.3 mm); IND 2.37 mm (1.1–2.3 mm); the head was small, but longer than its width or depth, HL 11.97 mm (6.2–12.5 mm); HW 7.28 mm (3.8–6.9 mm); HD 6.5 mm (2.5–4.7 mm); AG 34.13 mm (14.1–33.1 mm); body was slender (BW/SVL ratio 0.17, 0.12–0.17) with an elongated trunk (AG/SVL ratio 0.56, 0.45–0.64); tail, broken or regenerated tails were excluded, was not as wide (TBW, 5.2 mm, 2.3–5.2 mm) as the trunk, but was longer (64.5 mm, 24.7–55.4 mm) than SVL (TL/SVL ratio 1.06, 0.94–1.17). Limbs were short, FLL 12.53 mm (8.1–12.7 mm) and HLL 16.45 mm (9.5–15.8 mm); the tips of the digits of the fore-limb and hind-limb did not meet each other when the limbs were adpressed against each other along the body axis, but for twelve of fourteen individuals they did meet each other. The lengths of the digits (measurements in parentheses) were as follows: left manus IV (2.68) > III (2.65) > II (1.91) > V (1.6) > I (1); left pes IV (5.07) > III (3.26) > V (2.8) > II (2.15) > I (0.95).

The rostral was single; wider than it was high; and was in contact with the first supralabials, nasals and frontonasals. The nasal rhomboid comprised circular nostrils, located at the centre of the nasal cavity. Fronto-nasal was fan-shaped and connected to the prefrontals. Prefrontals were pentagonal, a pair of prefrontals were connected with a border between them, located between the fronto-nasal and frontal (seven of fourteen individuals); three of the 14 individuals had frontals, fronto-nasals and a pair of prefrontals connected by a point; 3 of the 14 individuals had the frontal and frontal-nasal widely in contact with each other and the prefrontals were separate from each other. The frontal was wedge-shaped, which contacts with the prefrontals, the third and fourth supraoculars and a pair of frontoparietals posterolaterally. Six of the 14 individuals had frontals in contact with fronto-nasals, the prefrontals were not in contact with each other. The second supraocular region, in contact with the frontal and prefrontal regions, was a single tiny supracular hexagon, between the second supraocular and prefrontal regions. A pair of frontoparietals were in broad contact with each other; besides each frontoparietal was in contact with the frontal, third, fourth supraoculars, the parietal and interparietal. The interparietal rhomboid, in contrast with the frontoparietals, was posteriorly in contact with the parietals. A pair of parietals contact each other; additionally, each parietal was in contact with the interparietal, frontoparietal, fourth supracular and temporals. There were three scales between the nasal cavity and eyes; 10 of the individuals had at least four scales on one side. There were seven supralabials, four loreals between the nasal and eyes and a fourth tiny loreal. The specimen had seven infralabials; three individuals had six infralabials on each side. The temporal 1+2 and the second subtemporal were large and trapezoidal. The mental was wider than long, in contact with the first infralabial laterally and postmental posteriorly. There was a single, large postmental with four pairs of large chin-shields; the first pair was in contact with the second pair narrowly separated by a single medial scale. Dorsal scalation was homogeneous with four columns; there were longitudinal scale rows at mid-body 25 (25–28). There were 28 (25–29) scales around the middle of the neck and 50 (42 –51) ventral scales. There were 17 toe IV lamellae.

Colouration in life. The back was coppery brown, with dark longitudinal spots on the edges of the scales, which generated three black lines continuing on-to the tail; there were white longitudinal spots in the middle of the scales, generating three irregular lines continuing to the back of the tail base. A dark sooty area on each side was sharply defined above, but faded below the belly. The dark sooty area began after the nasal cavity and ended at the middle of the tail (Fig. 5). The abdomen of the females was slightly orange-red during the breeding seasons.

Figure 5. 

The general aspect and close-up views of Ablepharus alaicus (XND2023092704) in life from Qapqal Xibe Autonomous County, Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture, Xinjiang, China. A. Dorsolateral view of body; B. Ventral view of body; C. Dorsal view of head; D. Right side view of head; E. Ventral view of head. Photos by: Wei-Zhen Gao.

Reproduction, activity, habitats, diet and distribution

Viviparity. All fourteen specimens were collected during the day, from 12:00 to 18:00 h; therefore, this species appears to be diurnal. These individuals were collected at the bottom of a hill at an altitude of 2466 m and the microhabitats were covered with shrubs and gravel. Their diet remains poorly understood, but they are thought to be carnivorous. This species has been observed in Qapqal Xibe Autonomous County, China and probably in adjacent Zhaosu County, which, along with Tianshan, has populations that are connected to those in Kazakhstan (Fig. 1).

Discussion

There have been long-standing questions on the generic taxonomy of Ablepharine skinks (Grismer et al. 2019; Mirza et al. 2022). Nineteen species were included in the genus Ablepharus (Uetz et al. 2023). Without molecular data, the genera Ablepharus, Asymblepharus and Himalblepharus, were distinguished using morphological variation which was widely accepted. Our results showed that the latter two genera are embedded within Ablepharus, which is consistent with Mirza et al. (2022). The distribution of A. alaicus in China was uncertain, although studies and the IUCN have suggested it is distributed in the western Xinjiang border regions (Zhao et al. 1999; Shestopal et al. 2019). Based on the phylogenetic tree of the three sequences (12S, 16S and ND2), our samples, Groups IKAP and KKAP, were close to A. eremchenkoi and A. alaicus, respectively. Additionally, per the results of the morphological comparison, we identified these two groups as A. eremchenkoi and A. alaicus.

The distribution of A. A. kucenkoi is around north-eastern Tianshan, including south-eastern Kazakhstan, north-eastern Kyrgyzstan and the Ili Valley of Xinjiang (Eremchenko and Shcherbak 1986; Zhao et al. 1999). Group IKAP clustered with A. alaicus (AY607281), which was collected from Kazakhstan (BI/ML:1/98, Fig. 2) and with samples from similar altitudes (2466 m vs. 2000 m, respectively). Therefore, the taxon collected from IKAP is likely A. A. kucenkoi. However, we found intrapopulation variations in the positions of the prefrontal, fronto-nasal and frontal regions. Six of fourteen (~ 42%) specimens’ frontal and fronto-nasal borders were connected. Eight of fourteen (52%) of the specimens were not connected because the prefrontals were connected at the border, but the middle temporal was large and trapezoidal, consistent with A. A. kucenkoi. Eremchenko and Shcherbak (1986) demonstrated that approximately 9% of the specimens had prefrontals connected at the border. Such intrapopulation variations in the positions of these scales were also observed in A. deserti (Shi et al. 2006). Populations from south-western Xinjiang were assumed to be A. A. alaicus; the frontal and fronto-nasal regions of this subspecies were not connected (Zhao et al. 1999). However, based on all voucher specimens in this study, these two scales were connected for most individuals and Group KKAP clustered with A. eremchenkoi (BI/ML: 1/100, Fig. 2), which excluded this subspecies. Therefore, whether A. A. alaicus is distributed in southern Xinjiang requires further exploration. Notably, we discovered new records of A. deserti and substantiated the presence of this species north of the Ili River (Liang et al. 2021). Therefore, at least two skinks are distributed in Ili Valley and further research is necessary to determine whether these two species have a sympatric distribution in China (Kolbintzev et al. 1999).

Xinjiang covers one-sixth of China’s territory; however, it remains the least studied area in China for reptiles. For example, the checklist of lizards in China has increased by almost 60 species since 2015 (Cai et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2020; Liang and Meiri 2023), of which only three (two new national records and two newly-described species) are from Xinjiang. The record of A. eremchenkoi reported in this study represents the fifth species added to the lizard checklist of Xinjiang. Hence, further research should aim to document the biodiversity of the region.

Conclusion

In summary, we identified the distribution of A. alaicus and A. eremchenkoi in Xinjiang, northwest China. These records indicate that the number of skink species in Xinjiang ranges from two to three. We also reported the phylogeny, morphology and natural historical notes of these two species.

Acknowledgements

We thank Philipp Wagner and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on a previous draft of this manuscript, Anna Zimin for providing and translating Russian references. We also thank Editage for language editing service and Ju-xin Gu for providing his field observation.This work was supported by the Third Xinjiang Scientific Expedition Program [2022xjkk1200] and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [32260527 and 31660613].

References

  • Burland TG (1999) DNASTAR’s Lasergene Sequence Analysis Software. In: Misener V, Krawetz SA (Eds) Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ., 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-192-2:71
  • Che J, Jiang K, Yan F, Zhang YP (2020) Amphibians and reptiles in Tibet: Diversity and evolution. Science press, Beijing.
  • Elpatjevsky V (1901) The genus Ablepharus Fitz. in the collections of the Zoological Museum of Moscow University. Dnevnik Zoologicheskogo Otdeleniya Imperatorskogo Obschestva Liubiteley Estestvoznaniya, Moscow 3: 37–39.
  • Eremchenko V (1987) Systematic and relative links of Indo-Himalayan scincells (Sauria, Scincidae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Khyrghyz SSR 1987: 54–57.
  • Eremchenko VK (1983) Distribution & geographic variability of Asymblepharus alaicus (Sauria, Scincidae). Vestnik Zoologii, Kiev 1983: 35–42.
  • Eremchenko VK, Shcherbak NN (1986) Ablepharine lizards of the USSR and adjacent countries. Ylym Publisher, Frunze.
  • Grismer LL, Wood PLJ, Quah ESH, Anuar S, Poyarkov NA, Thy N, Orlov NL, Thammachoti P, Seiha H (2019) Integrative taxonomy of the Asian skinks Sphenomorphus stellatus (Boulenger, 1900) and S. praesignis (Boulenger, 1900) with the resurrection of S. annamiticus (Boettger, 1901) and the description of a new species from Cambodia. Zootaxa 4683: 381–411. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4683.3.4
  • Karamiani R, Rastegar-Pouyani N, Rastegar-Pouyani E (2021) Phylogenetic relationships amongst the snake-eyed lizards of the genus Ablepharus Fitzinger, 1823 (Sauria, Scincidae) in the Iranian Plateau based on mtDNA sequences. Herpetozoa 34: 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-023-09603-6
  • Kolbintzev V, Miroschnichenko L, Dujsebayeva T (1999) Distribution and natural history of lidless skinks, Asymblepharus alaicus and Ablepharus deserti (Sauria: Scincidae) in Aksu jabagly nature reserve (Western Tien-Shan Mountains). Asiatic Herpetological Research 8: 69–74.
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33: 1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
  • Letunic I, Bork P (2021) Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Research 49:W293-w296. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab301
  • Liang T, Meiri S (2023) Lizard richness in mainland China is more strongly correlated with energy and climatic stability than with diversification rates. Journal of Biogeography 51(1): 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.14736
  • Liang T, Wang P, Wu KF, An J, Shi L (2021) Rediscovery and northeastward range extension for Ablepharus deserti (Squamata: Scincidae) in the northwest of China. Herpetology Notes 14: 1373–1374.
  • Lichtenstein H (1823) Verzeichniß der Doubletten des zoologischen Museums der Königl. Zoologisches Museum, Berlin.
  • Mirza ZA, Bragin AM, Bhosale H, Gowande GG, Patel H, Poyarkov NA (2022) A new ancient lineage of ablepharine skinks (Sauria: Scincidae) from eastern Himalayas with notes on origin and systematics of the group. PeerJ 10: e12800. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12800
  • Nikolsky AM (1902) Sur une nouvelle espèce du genre Ablepharus (Ablepharus kucenkoi n. sp. ; Lacertilia, Scincidae)., 7 (1–2), 7–9. Annuaire du Musée Zoologique de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de Saint Pétersbourg 7: 7–9.
  • Panfilov AM (1999) Mejpopyliatsionnie otiosheniia i vidovaia prinadkejnosty gornykh ligozomiykh kompleksa Asymblepharus alaicus Severo-Zapadnogo i Vnutrennego Tian-Shania. Izvestija nacional’noj Akademii Nauk Kyrghyzskoj Respubliki 1: 51–55.
  • Poulakakis N, Kapli P, Kardamaki A, Skourtanioti E, Göcmen B, Ilgaz Ç, Kumlutaş Y, Avci A, Lymberakis P (2013) Comparative phylogeography of six herpetofauna species in Cyprus: late Miocene to Pleistocene colonization routes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 108: 619–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.02039.x
  • Poulakakis N, Lymberakis P, Tsigenopoulos CS, Magoulas A, Mylonas M (2005) Phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of snake-eyed skink Ablepharus kitaibelii (Sauria: Scincidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 34: 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2004.10.006
  • Qi S, Ren JL, Wang Z, Yang HC, Jiang K (2022) On the occurrence of Lygosoma siamense Siler, Heitz, Davis, Freitas, Aowphol, Termprayoon & Grismer, 2018 (Squamata, Scincidae) in China. Herpetozoa 35: 51–58. https://doi.org/10.3897/herpetozoa.35.e80151
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67: 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  • Shestopal A, Dujsebayeva T, Nuridjanov D, Golynsky E, Borkin L, Milto K, Shi L, Wang Y (2019) Asymblepharus alaicus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species:e.T47756066A47756073.
  • Shi L, Zhou R, Yuan H (2006) A new genus and a new species record to China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 31: 912–915 [in Chinese]
  • Skourtanioti E, Kapli P, Ilgaz Ç, Kumlutaş Y, Avcı A, Ahmadzadeh F, Crnobrnja-Isailović J, Gherghel I, Lymberakis P, Poulakakis N (2016) A reinvestigation of phylogeny and divergence times of the Ablepharus kitaibelii species complex (Sauria, Scincidae) based on mtDNA and nuDNA genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 103: 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.07.005
  • Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673–4680. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
  • Vaissi S, Kurnaz M, Şahin MK, Hernandez A (2023) Climatic niche divergence and conservatism promote speciation in snake-eyed skinks (Sauria: Scincidae): New insight into the evolution and diversification of Ablepharus species. Evolutionary Biology 50: 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-023-09603-6
  • Wang K, Ren JL, Chen HM, Lv ZT, Guo XG, Jiang K, Chen JM, Li JT, Guo P, Wang YY, Che J (2020) The updated checklists of amphibians and reptiles of China. Biodiversity Science 28: 189–218. https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2019238
  • Xu W, Dong WJ, Fu TT, Gao W, Lu CQ, Yan F, Wu YH, Jiang K, Jin JQ, Chen HM, Zhang Y P, Hillis DM, Che J (2021) Herpetological phylogeographic analyses support a Miocene focal point of Himalayan uplift and biological diversification. National Science Review 8: nwaa263. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa263
  • Zhang D, Gao FL, Jakovlić I, Zou H, Zhang J, Li WX, Wang GT (2020) PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 20: 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13096
  • Zhao EM, Zhao KT, Zhou KY (1999) Fauna Sinica, Reptilian Volume 2, Squamata (Beijing Science Press, Beijing, Lacertilia). Science Press, Beijing.
  • Zhong J, Guo K, Ma L (2021) First record of mitochondrial genome of Scincella reevesii (Squamata: Scincidae) and phylogenetic analysis. Mitochondrial DNA Part B Resources 6: 564–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2021.1875903

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

Best models for the three sequences

Tao Liang, Qian-ru Liang, Jiang-miao Ran, Jing An, Ya-hui Huang, Peng Ding, Lei Shi

Data type: docx

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (13.10 kb)
Supplementary material 2 

Average uncorrected p-distances (percentages) between Ablepharus

Tao Liang, Qian-ru Liang, Jiang-miao Ran, Jing An, Ya-hui Huang, Peng Ding, Lei Shi

Data type: xlsx

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (14.44 kb)
Supplementary material 3 

Morphological traits of all individuals included in this study

Tao Liang, Qian-ru Liang, Jiang-miao Ran, Jing An, Ya-hui Huang, Peng Ding, Lei Shi

Data type: xlsx

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (36.45 kb)
login to comment