<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://herpetozoa.pensoft.net/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">90</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:4EBD0208-8328-5D69-8C44-EC50939C0967</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:52E200AF-408A-423E-8797-5BFC4FDE0F99</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Herpetozoa</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">Herpetozoa</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1013-4425</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2682-955X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Pensoft Publishers</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/herpetozoa.39.e171364</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">171364</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="biological_taxon">
          <subject>Gekkonidae</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Reproductive Biology</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="geographical_area">
          <subject>Morocco</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>High-elevation females lay larger eggs in the Atlas Day Gecko, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Quedenfeldtia">Quedenfeldtia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="trachyblepharus">trachyblepharus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Boettger, 1873)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Lansari</surname>
            <given-names>Aziza</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9953-9169</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Blouin-Demers</surname>
            <given-names>Gabriel</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Lourdais</surname>
            <given-names>Olivier</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7840-103X</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>El Mouden</surname>
            <given-names>El Hassan</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2711-4393</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A4">4</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Bouazza</surname>
            <given-names>Abdallah</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">a.bouazza@uiz.ac.ma</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5083-5565</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Laboratory 2GBEI, Département de sciences et techniques, Faculté Polydisciplinaire de Taroudant, Ibn Zohr University, B.P: 271, 83 000 Taroudant, Morocco</addr-line>
        <institution>Laboratory 2GBEI, Département de sciences et techniques, Faculté Polydisciplinaire de Taroudant, Ibn Zohr University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Taroudant</addr-line>
        <country>Morocco</country>
</aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Département de biologie, Université d’Ottawa, Ottawa ON, K1N 6N5, Canada</addr-line>
        <institution>Département de biologie, Université d’Ottawa</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Ottawa</addr-line>
        <country>Canada</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/03c4mmv16</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A3">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, CNRS UMR 7372, 79360 Villiers en Bois, Chizé, France</addr-line>
        <institution>Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Chizé</addr-line>
        <country>France</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A4">
        <label>4</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Département de biologie, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech, B.P. 40000 Morocco</addr-line>
        <institution>Département de biologie, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Marrakech</addr-line>
        <country>Morocco</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/04xf6nm78</uri>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Abdellah Bouazza (<email xlink:type="simple">a.bouazza@uiz.ac.ma</email>)</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p>Academic editor: Johannes Foufopoulos</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>30</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>39</volume>
      <fpage>273</fpage>
      <lpage>279</lpage>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/EA51CA90-C3F9-55C7-8261-588D23305279">EA51CA90-C3F9-55C7-8261-588D23305279</uri>
      <uri content-type="zoobank" xlink:href="https://zoobank.org/12AAB19E-08D9-4485-AC4D-A35AF5B77A1A">12AAB19E-08D9-4485-AC4D-A35AF5B77A1A</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>07</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>16</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Aziza Lansari, Gabriel Blouin-Demers, Olivier Lourdais, El Hassan El Mouden, Abdallah Bouazza</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="zoobank" xlink:type="simple">https://zoobank.org/12AAB19E-08D9-4485-AC4D-A35AF5B77A1A</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p>Identifying how reproductive investment varies along elevational gradients is a powerful tool for understanding life-history evolution in ectotherms. In taxa with invariant clutch size, reproductive responses to harsh environments are expected to be determined by per-offspring investment (egg provisioning), while at the same time being subject to maternal body size effects. We investigated elevational variation in reproductive traits of the Atlas Day Gecko, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Quedenfeldtia">Quedenfeldtia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="trachyblepharus">trachyblepharus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, a diurnal high-mountain species endemic to the High Atlas Mountains (Morocco). Maternal body size increased with elevation, indicating larger females at higher sites. Egg mass and egg volume increased with maternal body size, whereas relative clutch mass (<abbrev xlink:title="relative clutch mass">RCM</abbrev>) declined with female size. Importantly, high-elevation females produced larger eggs than expected for their body size. Hatchling size and body condition were positively associated with egg traits, but elevation did not explain additional variation in hatchling traits once egg traits were considered. Overall, the differences observed in offspring traits appear to be mediated by maternal egg provisioning, consistent with increased per-offspring investment that may enhance offspring survival in high-elevation environments.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Key Words</label>
        <kwd>alpine gecko</kwd>
        <kwd>egg size</kwd>
        <kwd>hatchling size</kwd>
        <kwd>High Atlas</kwd>
        <kwd>maternal size</kwd>
        <kwd>relative clutch mass</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="sec1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Life-history variation in reptiles reflects natural selection on energy allocation to growth, survival, and reproduction strategies across heterogeneous environments. Along latitudinal and elevational gradients, populations often diverge in maternal investment and in the maternal effects shaping offspring phenotype at birth, consistent with both local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Doughty 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bonnet et al. 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Kratochvíl and Frynta 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Uusi-Heikkilä et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Slavenko et al. 2019</xref>).</p>
      <p>Elevational gradients provide powerful natural experiments because they generate predictable shifts in temperature regimes, season length, food availability, and predation pressure, thereby shaping activity seasons and the time window available for reproduction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Grant and Dunham 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Mathies and Andrews 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zamora-Camacho et al. 2013</xref>). In response to these environmental shifts, populations are expected to diverge in reproductive traits and strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ballinger 1979</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Meiri et al. 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Wise and Jaeger 2021</xref>). For example, in cold environments, reproductive females may partially buffer embryos from suboptimal or variable thermal conditions through behavioural thermoregulation and microhabitat selection (i.e., maternal manipulation), thereby influencing developmental trajectories and offspring phenotype (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Le Henanff et al. 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Feldman et al. 2016</xref>). However, these patterns are not universal because elevation integrates multiple ecological dimensions, and reproductive responses are constrained by lineage-specific traits, including transitions to viviparity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Shine 1983</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Blackburn 2000</xref>). Thus, many oviparous lineages persist in cold environments and may instead adjust nesting behaviour (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Blouin-Demers et al. 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Pike et al. 2010</xref>), reproductive timing (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Olsson and Shine 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Warner and Shine 2007</xref>), and egg provisioning (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Deme et al. 2022</xref>) to cope with thermal and seasonal limitations.</p>
      <p>In oviparous reptiles, female body size often predicts reproductive investment because it constrains abdominal volume and energetic capacity, thereby shaping egg size, clutch size, or both (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bonnet et al. 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Kratochvíl and Frynta 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Martins et al. 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Lourdais et al. 2024</xref>). This size dependence is particularly relevant in taxa with invariant clutch size, where the classical offspring size–number trade-off is expressed primarily through egg size rather than clutch size (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Goodman 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Kratochvíl and Frynta 2006</xref>). In geckos (clade <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily" reg="Gekkota">Gekkota</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), egg dimensions and mass can vary among females, populations, and environments, providing a key pathway through which mothers modulate offspring traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Sakai 2021</xref>). Egg size, in turn, is a major determinant of hatchling size and condition, with potential consequences for early energy reserves, growth, and survival (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">VanDamme et al. 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Iraeta et al. 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Le Henanff et al. 2013</xref>). Understanding how elevation and maternal size jointly shape egg provisioning therefore offers a mechanistic link between environmental gradients and early-life fitness components.</p>
      <p>The Atlas Day Gecko, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Quedenfeldtia">Quedenfeldtia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="trachyblepharus">trachyblepharus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Boettger, 1873), is a cold-adapted, diurnal gecko whose activity and reproduction are constrained by seasonal thermal conditions in the High Atlas Mountains of Morocco (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bouazza et al. 2016</xref>). Early in the activity season, field body temperatures are typically below the preferred range (<italic>T</italic><sub>pref</sub> ≈ 29.5–31.5 °C), whereas individuals reach or remain within <italic>T</italic><sub>pref</sub> mainly in late spring (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bouazza et al. 2016</xref>). The species occurs from approximately 1,400 m to &gt; 4,000 m, offering a natural gradient for testing how high-mountain conditions shape variation in maternal traits and egg provisioning. Although elevational divergence in reproductive traits has been documented in several lizard clades (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Mathies and Andrews 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Iraeta et al. 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Rodríguez-Díaz and Braña 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Deme et al. 2022</xref>), few studies have examined variation in egg and hatchling traits across elevation in oviparous geckos with invariant clutch size.</p>
      <p>Here, we examine how maternal body size and elevation of origin jointly relate to reproductive traits in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Quedenfeldtia">Q.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="trachyblepharus">trachyblepharus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. We quantified egg mass, egg volume, and relative clutch mass (<abbrev xlink:title="relative clutch mass">RCM</abbrev>) in females sampled across five elevation classes (1,900–3,000 m) in the High Atlas Mountains and tested whether elevation explains variation in these traits. To link maternal investment to early offspring traits, we also measured hatchling size and body condition after incubation under standardized laboratory conditions. Our main question is whether high-elevation environments are associated with shifts in maternal size and/or per-offspring investment (egg traits), and whether such shifts translate into predictable variation in hatchling traits. We predicted that (i) consistent with Bergmann’s rule, females from higher elevations would exhibit larger body size and enhanced body condition. Given the invariant clutch size of geckos, we further predicted that (ii) maternal investment–egg mass, egg volume, and relative clutch mass (<abbrev xlink:title="relative clutch mass">RCM</abbrev>) would vary among elevations, reflecting increased per-offspring investment under the shorter activity seasons and thermal constraints characteristic of high-altitude environments.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
      <title>Materials and methods</title>
      <sec sec-type="Study sites and husbandry" id="sec3">
        <title>Study sites and husbandry</title>
        <p>From April–June 2014, we captured 51 gravid female Atlas Day Geckos at five sites located at approximately 1,900, 2,100, 2,600, 2,750, and 3,000 m asl in the vicinity of Oukaimeden, High Atlas Mountains, Morocco (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). The High Atlas climate is cold temperate, with annual precipitation of approximately 500–600 mm. Mean monthly temperatures range from ~22 °C in the warmest month to ~ – 5 °C in the coldest month, and snowfall occurs mainly between November and March (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bouazza et al. 2016</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F1">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/herpetozoa.39.e171364.figure1</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">B060DB55-BD22-58F8-9999-E65192745983</object-id>
          <label>Figure 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Location of the five sampling sites along an elevational gradient (1,900–3,000 m) in the High Atlas Mountains, Morocco.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="herpetozoa-39-273-g001.jpg" id="oo_1703511.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1703511</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Individuals were captured by hand or using a noose while basking during the day. At capture and again at oviposition, we measured snout–vent length (SVL; 0.1 mm, digital calipers; CAD-1, Barcelona, Spain) and body mass (0.001 g, electronic balance; KERN ABS-N, Balingen, Germany). Females were housed individually in plastic terraria (Fauna box; 30 × 20 × 20 cm) with a sand substrate and shelters. The room was maintained at 22 ± 2 °C, and basking heat was provided by a 60 W spotlight placed at one end of each enclosure, creating a thermal gradient of approximately 22–40 °C. Photoperiod was set to 14L:10D; water was provided ad libitum, and females were fed mealworms every two days until oviposition. Post-oviposition mass was recorded within 24 h of laying. Within a few days after oviposition, all females were released at their exact capture sites.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Egg and hatchling traits" id="sec4">
        <title>Egg and hatchling traits</title>
        <p>We measured each egg’s dimensions (length and width) to the nearest 0.01 mm and weighed them to an accuracy of 0.001 g. For further size measurements of these fragile eggs and subsequent hatchlings, we used imaging software (Inkscape, GNU General Public Licence), with a calibration scale included in each image. Eggs were incubated in moist vermiculite within a temperature-controlled climatic chamber (Pol-eko Aparatura, Wodzisław Śląski, Poland). Two incubation temperatures (24 °C and 29 °C) were initially used to encompass plausible nest temperatures for the species (Bouazza et al., unpublished data) and facilitate comparison with previous studies in lizards (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Le Henanff et al. 2013</xref>). However, no eggs hatched at 24 °C; consequently, all hatchling analyses are based solely on eggs incubated at 29 °C. Within 24 h of hatching, we measured hatchling SVL (to the nearest 0.1 mm) and body mass (to the nearest 0.001 g).</p>
        <p>Egg volume (mm<sup>3</sup>) was calculated as <italic>V</italic> = (π/6) × <italic>L</italic> × <italic>W</italic><sup>2</sup>, where <italic>L</italic> is egg length and <italic>W</italic> is egg width (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Maritz and Douglas 1994</xref>). Because females laid a single egg, clutch mass was equivalent to egg mass. Relative clutch mass (<abbrev xlink:title="relative clutch mass">RCM</abbrev>, %) was computed as <abbrev xlink:title="relative clutch mass">RCM</abbrev> = (egg mass/post-oviposition mass) × 100. Hatchling body condition was estimated as the residuals from a linear regression of ln(hatchling mass) on ln(hatchling SVL).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Statistical analyses" id="sec5">
        <title>Statistical analyses</title>
        <p>All analyses were performed in R (R Core Team) using RStudio (v. 4.5.1). Significance was assessed at α = 0.05. We inspected response variables and model residuals for normality (Shapiro–Wilk test) and homogeneity of variance (Levene’s test), and applied log-transformations when needed. Competing models were compared using Akaike’s Information Criterion (<abbrev xlink:title="Akaike’s Information Criterion">AIC</abbrev>) and likelihood-ratio tests. Pearson correlations were used to quantify bivariate relationships among continuous traits (e.g., maternal SVL vs. egg traits).</p>
        <p>To test for elevational variation in reproductive and hatchling traits, we fitted linear mixed-effects models with elevation class as a fixed factor, maternal SVL as a covariate for size-dependent traits, and site as a random effect (random intercept). We evaluated the effect of elevation by comparing nested models with and without the elevation term and conducted post hoc pairwise comparisons among elevation classes using Tukey-adjusted tests. For size-adjusted comparisons, we calculated residuals from regressions of egg mass, egg volume, and relative clutch mass (<abbrev xlink:title="relative clutch mass">RCM</abbrev>) on maternal SVL.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec6">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec sec-type="Maternal body size and reproductive output across elevation" id="sec7">
        <title>Maternal body size and reproductive output across elevation</title>
        <p>Maternal body size and body mass differed among the five elevation classes (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). Female SVL increased with elevation (r = 0.48, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) indicating that females were generally larger at higher sites. Maternal body mass also increased with elevation and this pattern persisted after controlling for maternal size (r = 0.34, <italic>p</italic> = 0.011). The smallest gravid female measured 35.7 mm SVL. All ovipositing females produced a single egg (clutch size = 1). Hatching success was 91% at 29 °C, and incubation lasted 42–51 days (mean 45.4 ± 0.47, n = 18).</p>
        <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Summary of results on the effect of elevation origin on maternal body size and reproductive traits of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Quedenfeldtia">Quedenfeldtia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="trachyblepharus">trachyblepharus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in the High Atlas of Morocco. Values are mean ± SE (n). Linear mixed effect models with maternal SVL as a covariate were used to remove the effect of maternal body size on reproductive traits. Hatchling traits and incubation time include only eggs incubated at 29 °C. Means with different superscripts differed significantly. Bold font indicates a significant difference.<bold/></p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Trait</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>1,900 m</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>2,100 m</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>2,600 m</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>2,750 m</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>3,000 m</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Elevation effect</th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Gravid female SVL (mm)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">40.44 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.57 (16)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">41.83 <sup>ab</sup> ± 0.72 (3)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">41.54 <sup>ab</sup> ± 0.46 (17)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">44.32 <sup>b</sup> ± 0.60 (13)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">45.02 <sup>b</sup> ± 0.92 (2)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">F<sub>4,47</sub> = 4.03, <bold><italic>p</italic> = 0.006</bold></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Gravid female mass (g)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.78 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.06 (16)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.89 <sup>ab</sup> ± 0.12 (3)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.05 <sup>ab</sup> ± 0.07 (17)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.33 <sup>b</sup> ± 0.08 (13)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.22 <sup>b</sup> ± 0.04 (2)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">F<sub>4,47</sub> = 4.03, <bold><italic>p</italic> = 0.006</bold></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Gravid female <abbrev xlink:title="body condition">BC</abbrev></bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">−0.032 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.024 (16)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.110 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.073 (3)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">−0.003 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.025 (18)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.015 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.021 (15)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.008 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.001 (2)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">F<sub>4</sub>,<sub>49</sub> = 1.55, <italic>p</italic> = 0.203</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Post-oviposition mass (g)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.52 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.05 (16)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.59 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.06 (3)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.73 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.05 (17)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.96 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.06 (13)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.06 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.04 (2)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">F<sub>4,46</sub> = 1.93, p = 0.12</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Relative clutch mass (<abbrev xlink:title="relative clutch mass">RCM</abbrev>, %)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">19.22 <sup>ab</sup> ± 0.48 (14)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">18.89 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.62 (3)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">17.41 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.45 (17)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">16.92 <sup>b</sup> ± 0.39 (13)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">21.18 <sup>b</sup> ± 0.11 (2)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">F<sub>4,41</sub> = 8.29, <bold><italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001</bold></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Egg mass (g)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.336 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.008 (14)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.352 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.010 (3)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.401 <sup>ab</sup> ± 0.009 (17)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.456 <sup>c</sup> ± 0.010 (13)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.537 <sup>d</sup> ± 0.018 (2)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">F<sub>4,41</sub> = 14.12, <bold><italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001</bold></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Egg volume (mm<sup>3</sup>)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">450.31 <sup>a</sup> ± 12.08 (16)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">479.62 <sup>a</sup> ± 14.73 (3)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">560.44 <sup>ab</sup> ± 13.01 (17)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">628.92 <sup>c</sup> ± 14.37 (13)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">717.53 <sup>d</sup> ± 57.50 (2)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">F<sub>4,43</sub> = 10.54, <bold><italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001</bold></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Incubation time (days)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">46.0 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.41 (4)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">45.5 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.50 (2)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">45.2 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.36 (5)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">44.8 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.31 (4)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">43.0 <sup>a</sup> (1)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">F<sub>4,12</sub> = 1.33, <italic>p</italic> = 0.315</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Hatchling SVL (mm)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20.29 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.54 (4)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20.85 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.61 (2)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">21.14 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.49 (5)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">21.62 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.44 (4)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">21.85 <sup>a</sup> (1)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">F<sub>4,11</sub> = 0.443, <italic>p</italic> = 0.775</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Hatchling body condition (<abbrev xlink:title="body condition">BC</abbrev>)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.012 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.021 (4)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.028 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.026 (2)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.054 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.019 (5)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.071 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.022 (4)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.10 <sup>a</sup> (1)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">F<sub>4,11</sub> = 1.223, <italic>p</italic> = 0.356</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Elevational variation in egg traits" id="sec8">
        <title>Elevational variation in egg traits</title>
        <p>Egg mass and egg volume were significantly affected by maternal SVL, with larger females having heavier (r = 0.62, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) and larger eggs (r = 0.52, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). Egg mass and egg volume differed significantly between sampled sites (egg mass: F<sub>4,45</sub> = 17.04, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001; egg volume: F<sub>4,47</sub> = 14.32, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), and this difference did not disappear even after the effect of maternal SVL had been removed (Tables 1, 2, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A</xref>). Egg mass residuals and egg volume residuals were correlated with elevation gradient (egg mass: r = 0.29, <italic>p</italic> = 0.04, egg volume: r = 0.32; <italic>p</italic> = 0.02).</p>
        <fig id="F2">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/herpetozoa.39.e171364.figure2</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">EA4AE8E4-F942-578B-9DBA-9C7C363BF41B</object-id>
          <label>Figure 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Elevational variation in size-adjusted egg traits in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Quedenfeldtia">Quedenfeldtia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="trachyblepharus">trachyblepharus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. <bold>A</bold>. Residual egg mass; <bold>B</bold>. residual relative clutch mass (<abbrev xlink:title="relative clutch mass">RCM</abbrev>). Residuals were calculated from regressions against maternal snout–vent length. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among elevations based on Tukey’s post hoc tests; groups sharing the same letter are not significantly different.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="herpetozoa-39-273-g002.jpg" id="oo_1703512.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1703512</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Relative clutch mass (<abbrev xlink:title="relative clutch mass">RCM</abbrev>) decreased with maternal SVL (r = – 0.36, p = 0.009) and varied among elevations, as shown by variation in residual <abbrev xlink:title="relative clutch mass">RCM</abbrev> among elevation (Tables 1, 2, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2B</xref>). However, <abbrev xlink:title="relative clutch mass">RCM</abbrev> residuals did not correlate with the elevational gradient (r = 0.042, p = 0.77).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Variation in hatchling traits" id="sec9">
        <title>Variation in hatchling traits</title>
        <p>Hatchling SVL increased with egg mass (r = 0.78, p = 0.0005) and egg volume (r = 0.5, p = 0.03). When maternal SVL and egg traits were included in the same model, the effect of maternal size was only marginal (p = 0.09), suggesting that the relationship between maternal size and hatchling size was largely mediated through egg provisioning. Elevation did not explain additional variation in hatchling SVL (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>).</p>
        <table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Statistical significance of different models for the effect of elevation on maternal body size and reproductive traits of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Quedenfeldtia">Quedenfeldtia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="trachyblepharus">trachyblepharus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in the High Atlas Mountains of Morocco. Bold font indicates a significant difference.<bold/></p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Trait</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Best model</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <abbrev xlink:title="Akaike’s Information Criterion">AIC</abbrev>
                  </bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>χ<sup>2</sup></bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>p-value</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Gravid female SVL (mm)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">~ Elevation</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">238.19</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">15.77</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>0.003</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Gravid female mass (g)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">~ maternal SVL + Elevation</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-27.11</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">14.39</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>0.006</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Post-oviposition mass (g)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">~ maternal SVL + Elevation</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-32.60</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8.39</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.078</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Relative clutch mass (<abbrev xlink:title="relative clutch mass">RCM</abbrev>, %)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">~ maternal SVL + Elevation</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">240.31</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">18.74</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>0.0008</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Egg mass (g)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">~ maternal SVL + Elevation</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-190.34</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">41.28</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>&lt;0.0001</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Egg volume (mm<sup>3</sup>)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">~ maternal SVL + Elevation</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">568.26</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">35.28</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>&lt;0.0001</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Incubation time (days)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">~ maternal SVL + Elevation</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">81.71</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.65</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.32</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Hatchling SVL (mm)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">~ maternal SVL + Elevation</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">43.46</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.45</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.65</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Body condition (<abbrev xlink:title="body condition">BC</abbrev>)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">~ maternal SVL + Elevation</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-34.48</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6.62</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.15</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Hatchling body condition (<abbrev xlink:title="body condition">BC</abbrev>) also increased with egg mass (r = 0.47, p = 0.046) and, more strongly, with egg volume (r = 0.65, p = 0.003). Elevation did not contribute additional explained variance in hatchling body condition (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec10">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>Our results revealed significant among-population differences in maternal body size, egg size, and relative clutch mass (<abbrev xlink:title="relative clutch mass">RCM</abbrev>) in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Quedenfeldtia">Quedenfeldtia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="trachyblepharus">trachyblepharus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> along an elevational gradient. Our finding that high-elevation females produced larger and heavier eggs is consistent with our predictions. These findings also suggest that females increase per-offspring investment in high-elevation populations, likely reflecting environmental differences along the gradient.</p>
      <p>Maternal body size increased with elevation, consistent with previous work showing that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Quedenfeldtia">Q.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="trachyblepharus">trachyblepharus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from higher altitudes tend to have larger body size, because higher elevation habitats provide this alpine gecko with a sort of “refuge” from competition, allowing for greater maternal investment to ensure better body conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Comas et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Comas 2020</xref>). Geographic patterns in lizard body size are often related to local environmental conditions, and factors such as resource abundance may promote larger female body size, aligning with broader patterns linking growth and reproductive investment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sebens 2003</xref>). In lizards, variation in maternal body size is influenced mainly by seasonal limitations of food resources, which can restrict growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Adolph and Porter 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Iraeta et al. 2006</xref>). Alternatively, between-population variation in maternal body size may have evolved during adaptive radiation and changing climate conditions in different localities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Angilletta 2009</xref>).</p>
      <p>Maternal body size is one of the primary traits that directly or indirectly influences life-history traits in organisms, leading to covariation among fitness-related traits, including egg traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Kratochvíl and Frynta 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Slavenko et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Wise and Jaeger 2021</xref>). In our study, egg mass and egg volume increased with maternal SVL, consistent with the positive association between maternal size and offspring quality reported in geckos and other lizards with fixed clutch size (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Goodman 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Kratochvíl and Frynta 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Schwarz and Meiri 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Sakai 2021</xref>). However, relative clutch mass (<abbrev xlink:title="relative clutch mass">RCM</abbrev>) declined with female size, indicating negative allometry in reproductive allocation. This relationship may make female reproductive output susceptible to age because lizards show indeterminate growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Vitt and Congdon 1978</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Shine 1992</xref>). In <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Quedenfeldtia">Q.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="trachyblepharus">trachyblepharus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, however, maternal body size is not the only determinant of reproductive traits (egg mass/egg volume/<abbrev xlink:title="relative clutch mass">RCM</abbrev>), because among-population differences in reproductive traits persisted after controlling for maternal SVL. Previous studies on lizard species have shown that variation in reproductive output can be site-specific, depending on the size of reproductive females and their energy storage capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Roitberg et al. 2013</xref>). Therefore, reproductive traits among populations of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Quedenfeldtia">Q.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="trachyblepharus">trachyblepharus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> may be driven by the interplay between intrinsic factors (e.g., body size and age) and extrinsic factors (e.g., local environmental conditions) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Comas et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Comas 2020</xref>).</p>
      <p>As we predicted, females produced larger eggs at higher elevations, and egg traits were key predictors of hatchling phenotype. Hatchling size and body condition were positively associated with egg traits (egg mass and egg volume). Egg size is often a close proxy for the total resources allocated to embryonic development, which may influence neonatal condition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Le Henanff et al. 2013</xref>). Similar patterns have been observed in lizards with variable clutch size, where females produce smaller clutches of larger eggs at high elevations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Deme et al. 2022</xref>). These results are consistent with the idea that environmental constraints in the Atlas Mountains (e.g., low temperatures and short activity seasons) shift female reproductive allocation per offspring investment (i.e. from offspring quantity to offspring quality), when time for growth is limited and larger offspring gain survival or performance advantages (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Andrews et al. 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Uller and Olsson 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Le Henanff et al. 2013</xref>). In contrast, elevation did not explain additional variation in hatchling SVL or body condition once egg traits were considered, suggesting that elevational effects on hatchlings operate mainly through maternal provisioning rather than direct population differences in hatchling phenotype.</p>
      <p>The observed elevational patterns in life-history traits may also be influenced by other biotic and abiotic factors associated with geographic distance between studied populations, beyond temperature directly linked to elevation. Unfortunately, we currently do not have detailed information on biotic factors such as prey availability and predation pressure for each population. Future work combining nest microclimate monitoring, maternal body condition, and incubation under fluctuating thermal regimes, followed by measurements of post-hatching growth and ecophysiological traits (e.g., early thermal preference and performance), would clarify the mechanisms and fitness consequences of increased egg size at high elevation (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Iraeta et al. 2006</xref>).</p>
      <p>In conclusion, our findings highlight how maternal size-dependent allocation and elevational context jointly shape reproductive output in a high-mountain gecko. Larger eggs at high elevation, independent of maternal size, underscore the potential importance of maternal provisioning as a pathway linking environmental constraint to offspring traits. However, understanding whether these shifts along elevational gradients are driven only by environmental conditions or reflect genetically based local adaptation requires further investigation.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>We thank Mohammed Znari and Tahar Slimani for logistical support and access to laboratory facilities.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Adolph SC, Porter WP (1996) Growth, Seasonality, and Lizard Life Histories: Age and Size at Maturity. Oikos 77: 267–278. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2307/3546065" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2307/3546065</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Andrews RM, Mathies T, Warner DA (2000) Effect of Incubation Temperature on Morphology, Growth, and Survival of Juvenile <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Sceloporus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">undulatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Herpetological Monographs 14: 420–431. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2307/1467055" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2307/1467055</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Angilletta MJ (2009) Thermal Adaptation: A Theoretical and Empirical Synthesis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 309 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Ballinger RE (1979) Intraspecific Variation in demography and Life History of the Lizard, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Sceloporus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">jarrovi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, Along an Altitudinal Gradient in Southeastern Arizona. Ecology 60: 901–909. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2307/1936858" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2307/1936858</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Blackburn DG (2000) Reptilian viviparity: past research, future directions, and appropriate models. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular &amp; Integrative Physiology 127: 391–409. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/S1095-6433(00)00272-5" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1095-6433(00)00272-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Blouin-Demers G, Weatherhead PJ, Row JR (2004) Phenotypic consequences of nest-site selection in black rat snakes (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Elaphe</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">obsoleta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). Canadian Journal of Zoology 82: 449–456. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1139/z04-014" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1139/z04-014</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Bonnet X, Naulleau G, Shine R, Lourdais O (2000) Reproductive versus ecological advantages to larger body size in female snakes, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Vipera</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">aspis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Oikos 89: 509–518. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1034/J.1600-0706.2000.890310.X" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1034/J.1600-0706.2000.890310.X</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Bouazza A, Slimani T, El Mouden H, Blouin-Demers G, Lourdais O (2016) Thermal constraints and the influence of reproduction on thermoregulation in a high-altitude gecko (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Quedenfeldtia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">trachyblepharus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). Journal of Zoology 300: 36–44. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/jzo.12353" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12353</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Comas M (2020) Body condition, sex and elevation in relation to mite parasitism in a high mountain gecko. Journal of Zoology 310: 298–305. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/jzo.12751" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12751</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Comas M, Escoriza D, Moreno-Rueda G (2014) Stable isotope analysis reveals variation in trophic niche depending on altitude in an endemic alpine gecko. Basic and Applied Ecology 15: 362–369. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.baae.2014.05.005" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2014.05.005</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Deme GG, Hao X, Ma L, Sun B, Du W (2022) Elevational variation in reproductive strategy of a widespread lizard: high-elevation females lay fewer but larger eggs. Asian Herpetological Research 13: 198–204. <ext-link xlink:href="10.16373/J.CNKI.AHR.210068" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.16373/J.CNKI.AHR.210068</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Doughty P (1996) Allometry of reproduction in two species of gekkonid lizards (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Gehyra</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>): effects of body size miniaturization on clutch and egg sizes. Journal of Zoology 240: 703–715. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05316.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05316.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Feldman A, Sabath N, Pyron RA, Mayrose I, Meiri S (2016) Body sizes and diversification rates of lizards, snakes, amphisbaenians and the tuatara. Global Ecology and Biogeography 25: 187–197. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/GEB.12398" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/GEB.12398</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>Goodman BA (2006) The effects of maternal size on clutch traits in a tropical invariant-clutch lizard, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Carlia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">rubrigularis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Scincidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Amphibia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>-<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superclass">Reptilia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> 27: 505–511. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1163/156853806778877167" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1163/156853806778877167</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Grant BW, Dunham AE (1990) Elevational Covariation in Environmental Constraints and Life Histories of the Desert Lizard <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Sceloporus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">merriami</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Ecology 71: 1765–1776. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2307/1937584" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2307/1937584</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Iraeta P, Monasterio C, Salvador A, Díaz JA (2006) Mediterranean hatchling lizards grow faster at higher altitude: a reciprocal transplant experiment. Functional Ecology 20: 865–872. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01162.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01162.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Kratochvíl L, Frynta D (2006) Body-size effect on egg size in eublepharid geckos (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Squamata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Eublepharidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), lizards with invariant clutch size: negative allometry for egg size in ectotherms is not universal. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 88: 527–532. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/J.1095-8312.2006.00627.X" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1095-8312.2006.00627.X</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Le Henanff M, Meylan S, Lourdais O (2013) The sooner the better: reproductive phenology drives ontogenetic trajectories in a temperate squamate (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Podarcis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">muralis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 108: 384–395. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.02005.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.02005.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Lourdais O, Dupoué A, Legentihomme J, Bonnet X, Shine R, Guiller G (2024) Elastic vipers: reproducing snakes adjust their size and internal volume to accommodate their developing offspring. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 537–547. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/BIOLINNEAN/BLAD114" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOLINNEAN/BLAD114</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Maritz MF, Douglas RM (1994) Shape quantization and the estimation of volume and surface area of reptile eggs. Journal of Herpetology 28: 281–291. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2307/1564526" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2307/1564526</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Martins S, Cardona L, Abella E, Silva E, de Santos Loureiro N, Roast M, Marco A (2022) Effect of body size on the long-term reproductive output of eastern Atlantic loggerhead turtles <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Caretta</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">caretta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Endangered Species Research 48: 175–189. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3354/ESR01198" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3354/ESR01198</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>Mathies T, Andrews RM (1995) Thermal and reproductive biology of high and low elevation populations of the lizard <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Sceloporus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">scalaris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>: implications for the evolution of viviparity. Oecologia 104: 101–111. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/BF00365568" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365568</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>Meiri S, Avila L, Bauer AM, Chapple DG, Das I, Doan TM, Doughty P, Ellis R, Grismer L, Kraus F, Morando M, Oliver P, Pincheira-Donoso D, Ribeiro-Junior MA, Shea G, Torres-Carvajal O, Slavenko A, Roll U (2020) The global diversity and distribution of lizard clutch sizes. Global Ecology and Biogeography 29: 1515–1530. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/geb.13124" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13124</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>Olsson M, Shine R (1997) The seasonal timing of oviposition in sand lizards (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Lacerta</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">agilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>): why early clutches are better. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 10: 369–381. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1046/j.1420-9101.1997.10030369.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1997.10030369.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>Pike DA, Webb JK, Shine R (2010) Nesting in a thermally challenging environment: nest-site selection in a rock-dwelling gecko, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Oedura</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">lesueurii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superclass">Reptilia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Gekkonidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 99: 250–259. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01353.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01353.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>Rodríguez-Díaz T, Braña F (2012) Altitudinal variation in egg retention and rates of embryonic development in oviparous <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Zootoca</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">vivipara</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> fits predictions from the cold-climate model on the evolution of viviparity. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25: 1877–1887. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02575.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02575.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>Roitberg ES, Kuranova VN, Bulakhova NA, Orlova VF, Eplanova GV, Zinenko OI, Shamgunova RR, Hofmann S, Yakovlev VA (2013) Variation of Reproductive Traits and Female Body Size in the Most Widely-Ranging Terrestrial Reptile: Testing the Effects of Reproductive Mode, Lineage, and Climate. Evolutionary Biology 40: 420. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/S11692-013-9247-2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/S11692-013-9247-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>Sakai O (2021) One or two eggs: what underlies clutch size variation within a gecko species? Zoology 146: 125911. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/J.ZOOL.2021.125911" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ZOOL.2021.125911</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>Schwarz R, Meiri S (2017) The fast-slow life-history continuum in insular lizards: a comparison between species with invariant and variable clutch sizes. Journal of Biogeography 44: 2808–2815. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/jbi.13067" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13067</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>Sebens KP (2003) The Ecology of indeterminate growth in animals. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 18: 371–407. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1146/ANNUREV.ES.18.110187.002103" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.ES.18.110187.002103</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <mixed-citation>Shine R (1983) Reptilian Reproductive Modes: The Oviparity-Viviparity Continuum. Herpetologica 39: 1–8. <ext-link xlink:href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/3892470" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.jstor.org/stable/3892470</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <mixed-citation>Shine R (1992) Relative Clutch Mass and Body Shape in Lizards and Snakes: is Reproductive Investment Constrained or Optimized? Evolution 46: 828–833. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/J.1558-5646.1992.TB02088.X" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1558-5646.1992.TB02088.X</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <mixed-citation>Slavenko A, Feldman A, Allison A, Bauer AM, Böhm M, Chirio L, Colli GR, Das I, Doan TM, LeBreton M, Martins M, Meirte D, Nagy ZT, Nogueira C de C, Pauwels OSG, Pincheira-Donoso D, Roll U, Wagner P, Wang Y, Meiri S (2019) Global patterns of body size evolution in squamate reptiles are not driven by climate. Global Ecology and Biogeography 28: 471–483. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/GEB.12868" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/GEB.12868</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <mixed-citation>Uller T, Olsson M (2010) Offspring size and timing of hatching determine survival and reproductive output in a lizard. Oecologia 162: 663–671. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s00442-009-1503-x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1503-x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <mixed-citation>Uusi-Heikkilä S, Kuparinen A, Wolter C, Meinelt T, Arlinghaus R (2012) Paternal body size affects reproductive success in laboratory-held zebrafish (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Danio</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">rerio</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). Environmental Biology of Fishes 93: 461–474. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s10641-011-9937-5" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-011-9937-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <mixed-citation>VanDamme R, Bauwens D, Braña F, Verheyen RF (1992) Incubation Temperature Differentially Affects Hatching Time, Egg Survival, and Hatchling Performance in the Lizard <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Podarcis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">muralis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Herpetologica 48: 220–228. <ext-link xlink:href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/3892675" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.jstor.org/stable/3892675</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <mixed-citation>Vitt LJ, Congdon JD (1978) Body Shape, Reproductive Effort, and Relative Clutch Mass in Lizards: Resolution of a Paradox. The American Naturalist 112: 595–608. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1086/283300" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1086/283300</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <mixed-citation>Warner DA, Shine R (2007) Fitness of juvenile lizards depends on seasonal timing of hatching, not offspring body size. Oecologia 154: 65–73. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s00442-007-0809-9" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0809-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <mixed-citation>Wise SE, Jaeger RG (2021) Maternal Body Size and Condition Predict Measures of Reproductive Success and Future Reproductive Allocation in Territorial Eastern Red-Backed Salamanders. Ichthyology &amp; Herpetology 109: 55–63. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1643/H2019323" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1643/H2019323</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <mixed-citation>Zamora-Camacho FJ, Reguera S, Moreno-Rueda G, Pleguezuelos JM (2013) Patterns of seasonal activity in a Mediterranean lizard along a 2200 m altitudinal gradient. Journal of Thermal Biology 38: 64–69. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.jtherbio.2012.11.002" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2012.11.002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <sec sec-type="Additional information" id="sec11">
      <title>Additional information</title>
      <sec sec-type="Conflict of interest" id="sec12">
        <title>Conflict of interest</title>
        <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Ethical statement" id="sec13">
        <title>Ethical statement</title>
        <p>All fieldwork complied with Moroccan regulations, and animal collection and handling were authorized by the Haut Commissariat aux Eaux et Forêts et à la Lutte Contre la Désertification (HCEFLCD), Rabat, Morocco (permit no. 05-13 HCEFLCD/DLCDPN/CFF), in coordination with the Faculty of Sciences, Cadi Ayyad University (Marrakech).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Artificial Intelligence (AI) use" id="sec14">
        <title>Artificial Intelligence (AI) use</title>
        <p>The authors accept full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the disclosure of any use of AI.</p>
        <p>No AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Funding" id="sec15">
        <title>Funding</title>
        <p>No funding was reported.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author contributions" id="sec16">
        <title>Author contributions</title>
        <p>Conceptualization: OL, AL, AB, GBD. Data curation: AL, AB. Formal analysis: GBD, AB, OL. Investigation: AB, AL. Methodology: AB, GBD, OL. Project administration: EHEM. Resources: EHEM. Software: AB. Supervision: AB. Validation: OL, AB, GBD. Writing - original draft: AL, AB. Writing - review and editing: GBD, OL, AB.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author ORCIDs" id="sec17">
        <title>Author ORCIDs</title>
        <p>A. Lansari <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9953-9169" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9953-9169</ext-link></p>
        <p>O. Lourdais <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7840-103X" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7840-103X</ext-link></p>
        <p>E.H. El Mouden <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2711-4393" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2711-4393</ext-link></p>
        <p>A. Bouazza <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5083-5565" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5083-5565</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Data availability" id="sec18">
        <title>Data availability</title>
        <p>All data supporting the findings of this study are provided in the main text..</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
